FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  
[Illustration: Dentition of Wolf.] This genus contains the wolf and the jackal, as well as the dog proper. The origin of the domestic dog (_Canis familiaris_) is involved in obscurity; it is mentioned in its domestic state and in an infinity of varieties in records of remote ages. Job talks of "the dogs of my flock," and in the Assyrian monuments, as far back as 3400 years before Christ, various forms are represented; and in Egypt not only representations of known varieties, easy to be recognised, are found, but numerous mummies have been exhumed, the animal having been held in special veneration. There is a preponderance of opinion strongly in favour of the theory that the domestic dog sprang from the wolf, and much argument has been advanced in support of this idea. The principal objection made to this by those who hold opposite views is the fact that no dog in a wild state barks, but only howls. Now for the evidence adduced in support of the former assertion; some domesticated species of dog closely resembling the wild wolf. Sir John Richardson says of the Eskimo dog that it is not only extremely like the North American wolf (_Canis lupus_), both in form, colour, and nearly in size, but that the howl of both animals "is prolonged so exactly in the same key that even the practised ear of an Indian fails at times to discriminate them." He adds of the dog of the Hare Indians, a distinct breed, that it is almost the same as the prairie wolf (_Canis latrans_), the skull of the dog appeared to him a little smaller, otherwise he could detect no difference in form, nor fineness of fur, nor the arrangement of spots of colour. Professor Kitchen Parker writes: "Another observer remarks that, except in the matter of barking, there is no difference whatever between the black wolf-dog of the Indians of Florida and the wolves of the same country. The dogs also breed readily with the wild animals they so closely resemble. The Indians often cross their dogs with wolves to improve the breed, and in South America the same process is resorted to between the domesticated and the wild dogs." He then goes on to allude to many varieties of dogs closely resembling wolves--the shepherd dog of Hungary, which is so like that a Hungarian has been known to mistake a wolf for one of his own dogs. Some Indian pariahs, and some dogs of Egypt, both now and in the condition of mummies, closely resemble the wolf of their country. The dome
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

closely

 

varieties

 

Indians

 
domestic
 

wolves

 
difference
 

country

 

resemble

 

support

 
mummies

domesticated

 

resembling

 

Indian

 

animals

 

colour

 

appeared

 

smaller

 
prolonged
 
discriminate
 
detect

distinct

 

practised

 
latrans
 

prairie

 

matter

 

allude

 

shepherd

 
America
 

process

 

resorted


Hungary

 

pariahs

 

condition

 

Hungarian

 

mistake

 

improve

 

writes

 
Another
 

observer

 
remarks

Parker

 

Kitchen

 

arrangement

 

Professor

 

readily

 

Florida

 

barking

 

fineness

 

Christ

 

Assyrian