FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  
could have restored its doomed fortunes. After the fifth night one of the leading actors, having received a better offer elsewhere, suddenly withdrew. This was the last straw. A collapse forthwith occurred. In the scramble for shares in the few remaining funds every one gained something, except the author, who was to have received L12 for each performance for the first twenty-five nights, and, L10 each for ten nights further. This disaster was a deep disappointment to Browning, and a by no means transitory one, for three or four years later he wrote (_Advt._ of "Bells and Pomegranates"): "Two or three years ago I wrote a play, about which the chief matter I much care to recollect at present is, that a pitful of good-natured people applauded it. Ever since, I have been desirous of doing something in the same way that should better reward their attention." But, except in so far as its abrupt declension from the stage hurt its author in the eyes of the critics, and possibly in those of theatrical managers, "Strafford" was certainly no failure. It has the elements of a great acting play. Everything, even the language (and here was a stumbling-block with most of the critics and criticasters), was subordinated to dramatic exigencies: though the subordination was in conformity with a novel shaping method. "Strafford" was not, however, allowed to remain unknown to those who had been unable to visit Covent Garden Theatre.[13] Browning's name had quite sufficient literary repute to justify a publisher in risking the issue of a drama by him; one, at any rate, that had the advantage of association with Macready's name. The Longmans issued it, and the author had the pleasure of knowing that his third poetic work was not produced at the expense of a relative, but at that of the publishers. It had but an indifferent reception, however. [Footnote 13: "It is time to deny a statement that has been repeated _ad nauseam_ in every notice that professes to give an account of Mr. Browning's career. Whatever is said or not said, it is always that his plays have 'failed' on the stage. In point of fact, the three plays which he has brought out have all succeeded, and have owed it to fortuitous circumstances that their tenure on the boards has been comparatively short."--E.W. GOSSE, in article in _The Century Magazine._] Most people who saw the performance of "Strafford" given in 1886, under the auspices of the Browning Society, were surp
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Browning

 

author

 

Strafford

 
critics
 
nights
 

people

 
performance
 

received

 

knowing

 

Footnote


pleasure
 

issued

 

Macready

 

Longmans

 

poetic

 
relative
 

indifferent

 

fortunes

 

expense

 
produced

reception

 
association
 

publishers

 

actors

 

leading

 

Theatre

 

Garden

 
unknown
 

unable

 

Covent


sufficient

 

literary

 

risking

 

repute

 

justify

 

publisher

 

advantage

 

article

 

comparatively

 

fortuitous


circumstances

 

tenure

 

boards

 

Century

 

Magazine

 

auspices

 
Society
 

succeeded

 

account

 

career