FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   >>  
e new Watson was unable to agree with this doctrine, so far as it * * * * * The legal conscience thus gratuitously thrust upon him was soon to undergo its first ordeal. An acquaintance of his, in a moment of absent-mindedness, murdered somebody, and asked Watson to persuade the inevitable jury that he hadn't. The said acquaintance explained to Watson that he simply did it when he wasn't thinking. Watson was in a hole. Obviously this was a case to which the embarrassment prescribed by the General Council of the Bar was applicable. This legal embarrassment, which, strictly speaking, ought now to be his, would not, however, have worried him in the least had it not been for another consideration. Suppose, after Watson had triumphantly got his client acquitted, it got about that the "innocent" had confessed his crime to counsel beforehand? That would mean an end to Watson's professional career. One does not thus slight the edicts of the mighty with impunity. Watson was too proud to ask his client to keep the deadly secret, or to apply the famous wriggle of _Hippolytus_: "My tongue hath sworn, but my heart remains unsworn." Nevertheless Watson gave his mind to the problem. In the end he decided on the following line of defence: "Not Guilty," and in the alternative "Guilty under justifiable circumstances, without malice aforethought but with intent to benefit the person murdered." Happily the General Council of the Bar has not yet assigned any moral embarrassment to a counsel who pleads "Not Guilty," and in the alternative, "Guilty." Watson therefore reasoned that if the jury returned a verdict of "Not Guilty," his client's alternative confession could be written off as an obvious mistake; on the other hand, if he were found "Guilty," the fact of confession would be an ethical asset towards securing for him a lenient view of the case. As I said, Watson behaved well. He proved to his own and the jury's satisfaction (1) that his client did not commit the murder; (2) that alternatively he did commit the murder, but that he did so for the good of everybody concerned; and (3) that in either case he never meant to do it. In the event the prisoner was acquitted without a stain upon his * * * * * Watson is now well established as the last hope of abandoned causes. He is a specialist in defence, and criminals of every shade throng to him. When a new one swims i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   >>  



Top keywords:
Watson
 

Guilty

 

client

 

embarrassment

 

alternative

 

commit

 
murder
 

confession

 

General

 
defence

Council

 

murdered

 

counsel

 

acquitted

 
acquaintance
 

malice

 

mistake

 
obvious
 

written

 

aforethought


Happily

 

person

 
justifiable
 

intent

 

benefit

 

assigned

 
reasoned
 

circumstances

 
returned
 
pleads

verdict

 

satisfaction

 

established

 

prisoner

 

abandoned

 

throng

 

specialist

 

criminals

 

securing

 
lenient

ethical
 

behaved

 

concerned

 

alternatively

 
proved
 

thinking

 

Obviously

 
prescribed
 

explained

 

simply