FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69  
70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   >>  
e owner of rights in a Berne work does not have to register before initiating suit. <SUP>3 \3\ It would seem that this exception would apply only to works that meet the definition of a ``Berne Convention work'' in 17 U.S.C. 101. --------------------------------------------------------------------- It is true that the holder of a copyright certificate of registration may secure some procedural advantages in litigating a copyright suit based on the effective date of registration. If registration is made before or within 5 years of publication, it will establish prima facie evidence in court of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate; and if registration is made within 3 months after publication of the work or prior to an infringement of the work, statutory damages and attorney's fees will be available to the copyright owner in court actions. Otherwise, only an award of actual damages and profits is available to the copyright owner. III. The Comments A. Comments Submitted The Copyright Office sought public comment concerning the implementation of the URAA both prior to and after publication of its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The Office first published a notice inviting interested parties to submit written comments and/or to attend a public meeting held at the Copyright Office on March 20, 1995, to discuss issues [[Page 50416]] related to NIEs and registration of restored works. 60 FR 7793 (Feb. 9, 1995). The Office sent this notice to over ninety authors rights organizations and industry groups, as well as 182 foreign government agencies with copyright authority, to give them the opportunity to respond. Approximately forty individuals attended the meeting, including representatives from authors' rights organizations, museums, the publishing industry, the film industry, and the computer software industry. <SUP>4 Fifteen written comments were submitted. The Office considered all of these views as it developed proposed procedures for the filing of NIEs and the registering of copyright claims in restored works. On July 10, the Office published proposed regulations in the Federal Register. 60 FR 35522 (July 10, 1995). \4\ A copy of all written comments and a summary of the meeting can be found in the Public Information Office of the Copyright Office, Room LM-401, James Madison Memorial Building, Washington, D.C. ---------------------------------
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69  
70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   >>  



Top keywords:

Office

 
copyright
 

registration

 
industry
 

Copyright

 

meeting

 

rights

 

publication

 

written

 

comments


public

 

authors

 
organizations
 

restored

 

notice

 

published

 
Comments
 

proposed

 
damages
 

certificate


agencies
 

government

 

foreign

 

authority

 

Information

 

opportunity

 

groups

 

Madison

 

ninety

 

Memorial


Washington

 

Building

 

Public

 
respond
 
submitted
 

considered

 

regulations

 
Fifteen
 

computer

 

software


related

 

registering

 

filing

 

developed

 

claims

 
Federal
 

Register

 
individuals
 

attended

 

including