FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  
entions: firstly, that the variations in efficiency within the membership of a time working union are not as likely to be as wide as among the men outside the union in the same trade, because the mere insistence on a standard rate tends to exclude some men much below the standard of competency. Secondly, practically all of the skilled trades unions require candidates for membership to prove their competency or be vouched for as competent by members who have worked with them. And thirdly, because the standard rate is the center of attention in negotiations and thus is made the presumptive rate (page 114-119). [74] D. A. McCabe, "The Standard Rate in American Trade Unions," page 105. [75] Report signed by Commissioners Manly, Walsh, Lennon, O'Connell, and Garrettson. Vol. I, "Final Report of the Commission on Industrial Relations" (1912-16), page 132. [76] Report on Collective Agreements in the United Kingdom (1910) (CD 5366), page xiv. [77] A. C. Pigou, "Economics of Welfare," page 441. [78] A. Marshall, "Principles of Economics" (7th Ed.), page 548. [79] R. H. Tawney, "Minimum Rates in the Tailoring Industry" (Great Britain), pages 110-111. See for similar view, 4th Report of N. Y. State Factory Investigating Commission, Vol. V (1915), testimony of Miss Van Kleeck. [80] D. A. McCabe, "The Standard Rate in American Trade Unions," page 14. [81] P. S. Collier, "Minimum Wage Legislation in Australasia," Fourth Report of the Factory Investigation Commission, N. Y. State, 1915, page 8243. [82] See pages 172-5, Chapter VIII. [83] See for examples, the reports of the Minimum Wage Commissions of The District of Columbia, Massachusetts and Oregon. Also the studies by R. H. Tawney and M. E. Bulkely on the English experience. Those of P. S. Collier and M. B. Hammond, on the Australasian experience. [84] Decision as to wages, etc., in North Atlantic & Hudson River Shipyards, Shipbuilding Adjustment Board, reported in _U. S. Monthly Labor Review_, May, 1918, page 136. See in same issue of the review, "Decision for Shipyards of San Francisco Bay and Columbia River, and Puget Sound Districts," pages 68-78. Also report of Benjamin M. Squires in the _Monthly Labor Review_, 1918, Sept., on the "New York Harbor Wage Adjustments." CHAPTER VIII--THE STANDARD WAGE (_Continued_) Section 1. What variations or limitations should be introduced into the principle of standardization in view of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Report

 

Minimum

 

standard

 

Commission

 

Standard

 

McCabe

 
Unions
 

Tawney

 

American

 

Economics


Decision
 

experience

 

Shipyards

 

Monthly

 

Review

 

Columbia

 

Factory

 

Collier

 
competency
 

variations


membership

 
Bulkely
 

English

 

studies

 

Massachusetts

 
Oregon
 

working

 
Atlantic
 

Hudson

 

Hammond


Australasian

 

District

 

Legislation

 

Australasia

 

Fourth

 

Investigation

 

examples

 
reports
 

Commissions

 

Chapter


efficiency
 
Adjustments
 

CHAPTER

 
STANDARD
 
Harbor
 
Squires
 

Continued

 

introduced

 

principle

 

standardization