ith offices to be filled
up, according to the old custom, by "carpet-baggers" from the United
States, on an allotment of increased patronage, fairly divided among
the "bosses" of the different States. Egypt under Lord Cromer is an
object-lesson of what may be done in a more excellent way by men of our
race in dealing with such a problem. Better still, and right under our
eyes, is the successful solution of the identical problem that
confronts us, in the English organization and administration of the
federated Malay States on the Malacca Peninsula.
[Sidenote: The Opposition as Old as Webster.]
I wish to speak with respect of the sincere and conscientious
opposition to all these conclusions, manifest chiefly in the East and
in the Senate; and with especial respect of the eminent statesman who
has headed that opposition. No man will question his ability, his moral
elevation, or the courage with which he follows his intellectual and
moral convictions. But I may be permitted to remind you that the noble
State he worthily represents is not now counted for the first time
against the interest and the development of the country. In February,
1848, Daniel Webster, speaking for the same great State and in the same
high forum, conjured up precisely the same visions of the destruction
of the Constitution, and proclaimed the same hostility to new
territory. Pardon me while I read you half a dozen sentences, and note
how curiously they sound like an echo--or a prophecy--of what we have
lately been hearing from the Senate:
Will you take peace without territory and preserve the integrity of
the Constitution of the country?... I think I see a course adopted
which is likely to turn the Constitution of this land into a
deformed monster--into a curse rather than a blessing.... There
would not be two hundred families of persons who would emigrate
from the United States to New Mexico for agricultural purposes in
fifty years.... I have never heard of anything, and I cannot
conceive of anything, more absurd and more affrontive of all sober
judgment than the cry that we are getting indemnity by the
acquisition of New Mexico and California. I hold that they are not
worth a dollar!
It was merely that splendid empire in itself, stretching from Los
Angeles and San Francisco eastward to Denver, that was thus despised
and rejected of Massachusetts. And it was only fifty years ago! With
all due respe
|