FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249  
250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   >>   >|  
t, without doing extreme violence to the analogy, find a sense in which the divine Redeemer does not help and does not know the growth of his own grace in believing hearts. The germination and increase of vegetation without the intervention of the sower and beyond his ken, represent a helplessness and an ignorance so definite and complete, that we cannot, on any rule of sober interpretation, apply it to the omniscient and omnipotent Redeemer. The impossibility of accepting the first suggestion throws us necessarily back on the only other supposition that remains;--the sower in the parable must represent the earthen vessel to which the ministry of the Gospel has been entrusted,--the human agent employed in the work of the Lord. This will, of course, accord perfectly with the representation in the heart of the parable that he who sows the seed neither helps the growth nor understands its secrets; but does it accord also with the representation, in the end of the parable, that he who in spring sowed the seed, thrusts in his sickle and reaps the ripened harvest? Some, assuming that the reaping means the closing of all accounts in the great day,[55] conclude that to represent the sowing as the ministry of men is incongruous with the reaping, which must, as they suppose, be the work of the Lord at his second coming. In this way they become involved between two impossibilities. If the Lord himself is represented as the sower the representation is inconsistent with the middle of the parable, in which it is declared that he neither aids nor understands the growth of the grain; if, on the other hand, men are represented as the sowers, the representation is inconsistent with the end of the parable, in which it is declared that they thrust in the sickle at the close of the dispensation and reap the harvest of the world. [55] Dr. Trench takes for granted, without a word of proof, or any evidence that he has even considered the question, that the reaping is the consummation of all things, the exclusive prerogative of the Lord. Now in order to escape from this double difficulty it is not necessary to put to the rack either the words or the thoughts of the parable. The path out of the difficulty is broad and straight; it is the path into it that is crooked and narrow. The question which demands solution here, and which, when solved, will solve all the rest, is, What is meant by thrusting in the sickle and reaping the r
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249  
250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

parable

 

reaping

 

representation

 

represent

 

sickle

 

growth

 

question

 

difficulty

 

represented

 

inconsistent


declared

 

understands

 

Redeemer

 
ministry
 

accord

 

harvest

 
sowers
 
coming
 

suppose

 

involved


middle

 

thrust

 
impossibilities
 

straight

 

crooked

 

narrow

 

thoughts

 

demands

 

solution

 

thrusting


solved

 

granted

 

evidence

 

Trench

 

dispensation

 

considered

 

escape

 

double

 

prerogative

 

consummation


things

 

exclusive

 

complete

 
definite
 

helplessness

 

ignorance

 

accepting

 

suggestion

 
impossibility
 
omnipotent