FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   >>   >|  
pp. 71, 72.] [Footnote 713: _Narratives of the Reformation_, Camden Soc., pp. 295, 296.] [Footnote 714: _Cf._ Duchess of Norfolk's letter to John Paston, 8th June, 1455 (_Paston Letters_, ed. 1900, i., 337), and in 1586 Sir Henry Bagnal asked the Earl of Rutland if he had a seat to spare in Parliament as Bagnal was anxious "for his learning's sake to be made a Parliament man" (_D.N.B._, Suppl., i., 96).] [Footnote 715: _L. and P._, xiv., 645; _cf._ Hallam, 1884, iii., 44-45.] [Footnote 716: Foxe, ed. Townsend, vi., 54. There are some illustrations and general remarks on Henry's relations with Parliament in Porritt's _Unreformed House of Commons_, 2 vols., 1903.] [Footnote 717: At Reigate, says the Duke, "I doubt whether any burgesses be there or not" (_L. and P._, x., 816); and apparently there were none at Gatton.] But these nominations were not royal, and there is no reason (p. 254) to suppose that the nominees were any more likely to be subservient to the Crown than freely elected members unless the local magnate happened to be a royal minister. Their views depended on those of their patrons, who might be opposed to the Court; and, in 1539, Cromwell's agents were considering the advisability of setting up Crown candidates against those of Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester.[718] The curious letter to Cromwell in 1529,[719] upon which is based the theory that the House of Commons consisted of royal nominees, is singularly inconclusive. Cromwell sought Henry's permission to serve in Parliament for two reasons; firstly, he was still a servant of the obnoxious and fallen Cardinal; secondly, he was seeking to transfer himself to Henry's service, and thought he might be useful to the King in the House of Commons. If Henry accepted his offer, Cromwell was to be nominated for Oxford; if he were not elected there, he was to be put up for one of the boroughs in the diocese of Winchester, then vacant through Wolsey's resignation. Even with the King's assent, his election at Oxford was not regarded as certain; and, as a matter of fact, Cromwell sat neither fo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cromwell

 

Footnote

 

Parliament

 

Commons

 

Bagnal

 
Winchester
 

letter

 

nominees

 
elected
 

Paston


Oxford
 
freely
 

setting

 

curious

 
candidates
 

Gardiner

 

advisability

 

subservient

 

Bishop

 
minister

patrons

 

happened

 
magnate
 

depended

 

members

 

agents

 
opposed
 

reasons

 
diocese
 
boroughs

vacant

 

accepted

 
nominated
 

Wolsey

 

resignation

 

matter

 

assent

 

election

 

regarded

 
thought

sought

 

inconclusive

 

permission

 

singularly

 

consisted

 
theory
 

firstly

 

seeking

 

transfer

 
service