FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242  
243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   >>   >|  
st the legislation of 1529-32 (_ibid._, v., 818). The likeness between Henry VIII. and Henry II. extended beyond their policy to their personal characteristics, and the great Angevin was much in the Tudor's mind at this period. Chapuys also called Henry VIII.'s attention to the fate of Henry II. (_ibid._, vii., 94).] [Footnote 748: _L. and P._, v., App. 10.] [Footnote 749: _Ibid._, v., 831; _cf._ v., 898, 989, App. 28.] These infinite clamours and grudging were not the result of the (p. 272) conscientious rejection of any Catholic or papal doctrine. Englishmen are singularly free from the bondage of abstract ideas, and they began their Reformation not with the enunciation of some new truth, but with an attack on clerical fees. Reform was stimulated by a practical grievance, closely connected with money, and not by a sense of wrong done to the conscience. No dogma plays such a part in the English Reformation as Justification by Faith did in Germany, or Predestination in Switzerland. Parliament in 1530 had not been appreciably affected by Tyndale's translation of the Bible or by any of Luther's works. Tyndale was still an exile in the Netherlands, pleading in vain for the same toleration in England as Charles V. permitted across the sea. Frith was in the Tower--a man, wrote the lieutenant, Walsingham, whom it would be a great pity to lose, if only he could be reconciled[750]--and Bilney was martyred in 1531. A parliamentary inquiry was threatened in the latter case, not because Parliament sympathised with Bilney's doctrine, but because it was said that the clergy had procured his burning before obtaining the State's consent.[751] Parliament was as zealous as Convocation against heresy, but wanted the punishment of heretics left in secular hands. [Footnote 750: _L. and P._, v., 1458.] [Footnote 751: _Ibid._, v., 522; vii., 171.] In this, as in other respects, the King and his Parliament were in the fullest agreement. Henry had already given proof of his anti-clerical bias by substituting laymen for churchmen in those great offices of State which churchmen had usually held. From time immemorial the Lord Chancellor had been a Bishop,[752] but in 1529 Wolsey was succeeded by More, and, later on, More by Au
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242  
243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Parliament

 

Footnote

 

doctrine

 

Tyndale

 

clerical

 
Bilney
 

Reformation

 

churchmen

 
reconciled
 

Bishop


parliamentary
 
martyred
 

threatened

 

inquiry

 
Chancellor
 

Wolsey

 

permitted

 

Charles

 

England

 
toleration

succeeded

 

immemorial

 
Walsingham
 

lieutenant

 

secular

 

substituting

 
wanted
 

punishment

 
heretics
 
fullest

agreement

 

respects

 
heresy
 

clergy

 

sympathised

 

procured

 

offices

 

zealous

 

Convocation

 
laymen

consent

 

burning

 

obtaining

 

Justification

 

infinite

 
clamours
 

Catholic

 

Englishmen

 

rejection

 
conscientious