The Project Gutenberg eBook, Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 102,
April 16, 1892, by Various, Edited by F. C. Burnand
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 102, April 16, 1892
Author: Various
Release Date: December 24, 2004 [eBook #14452]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII)
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI,
VOL. 102, APRIL 16, 1892***
E-text prepared by Malcolm Farmer, William Flis, and the Project Gutenberg
Online Distributed Proofreading Team
Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this
file which includes the original illustrations.
See 14452-h.htm or 14452-h.zip:
(http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/1/4/4/5/14452/14452-h/14452-h.htm)
or
(http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/1/4/4/5/14452/14452-h.zip)
PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI
VOL. 102
APRIL 16, 1892
WRESTLING WITH WHISTLERS.
(A REMINISCENCE OF A RECENT EXHIBITION.)
SCENE--_The Goupil Gallery. Groups of more or less puzzled
Britons discovered, conscientiously endeavouring to do justice
to the Collection, having realised that Mr. WHISTLER's work
is now considered entitled to serious consideration, but
feeling themselves unable to get beyond a timid tolerance.
In addition to these, there are Frank Philistines who are
here with a fixed intention of being funny, Matrons with a
strongly domesticated taste in Art, Serious Elderly Ladies,
Literal Persons, &c., &c._
_A Lady_ (_after looking at a representation of Old Battersea
Bridge--in the tone of a person who feels she is making a liberal
concession_). Well, do you know, I must say that _isn't_ so bad. I
shouldn't so much mind having _that_ in the room, should you?
[Illustration: A Brother Brush.]
_Her Companion_ (_dubiously_). Well, I don't know. He's put a steamer
in. Should you think there _were_ steamers in--a--(_vaguely_)--those
days?
_First Lady_ (_evidently considering Mr. WHISTLER capable of any
eccentricity_). Oh, I don't suppose he would mind _that_ much.
_First Literal Person_ (_coming to the portrait of Miss ALEXANDER_).
Well--(_plaint
|