FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  
ng, which saves making a second view. [Illustration: Fig. 120.] [Illustration: Fig. 121.] [Illustration: Fig. 122.] [Illustration: Fig. 123.] It would appear that under some conditions this might lead to error; as, for example, take the piece in Figure 123, and there is nothing to denote which is the length and which is the diameter of the piece, but there is a certain amount of custom in such cases than will usually determine this point; thus, the piece will be given a name, as pin or disk, the one denoting that its diameter is less than its length, and the other that its diameter is greater than its length. In the absence of any such name, it would be in practice assumed that it was a pin and not a disk; because, if it were a disk, it would either be named or shaded, or a second view given to show its unusual form, the disk being a more unusual form than the pin-form in mechanical structures. As an example of the use of the cross to denote a square, we have Figure 124, which represents a piece having a hexagon head, section _a_, _a'_, that is rectangular, a collar _b_, a square part _c_, and a round stem _d_. Here it will be noted that it is the rectangular part _a_, _a'_, that renders necessary two views, and that in the absence of the cross, yet another view would be necessary to show that part _c_ is square. [Illustration: Fig. 124.] [Illustration: Fig. 125.] A rectangular piece always requires two views and sometimes three. In Figure 125, for example, is a piece that would require a side view to show the length and breadth, and an edge view to show the thickness. Suppose the piece to be wedge-shaped in any direction; then another view will be necessary, as is shown in Figs. 126 and 127. In the former the wedge or taper is in the direction of its length, while in the latter it is in the direction of its thickness. Outline views, however, will not in some cases show the form of the figure, however many views be presented. An example of this is given in Figure 128, which represents a ring having a hexagon cross section. A sectional edge view is here necessary in order to show the hexagonal form. Another example of this kind, which occurs more frequently in practice, is a cupped ring such as shown in Figure 129. [Illustration: Fig. 126.] [Illustration: Fig. 127.] [Illustration: Fig. 128.] [Illustration: Fig. 129.] EXAMPLES. Let it be required to draw a rectangular piece such as is s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Illustration

 
Figure
 

length

 
rectangular
 

square

 

direction

 

diameter

 

practice


absence

 

thickness

 

unusual

 

denote

 
section
 

represents

 

hexagon

 

breadth


requires
 

require

 
occurs
 

Another

 
hexagonal
 

frequently

 

cupped

 

required


EXAMPLES

 

sectional

 

shaped

 

Outline

 

presented

 

figure

 

Suppose

 

determine


custom

 
amount
 
denoting
 

making

 

conditions

 
greater
 

collar

 

structures


assumed

 

mechanical

 

shaded

 

renders