ughly characteristic of the man and the statesman.
The relaxing of Republican doctrines, and of party ties generally,
divested the presidential election of any real political significance.
The Federalists were thoroughly discredited. As a party they made no
concerted effort to nominate candidates. Virtually, therefore, the
selection of a President rested with the congressional caucus of the
Republican party. The choice lay between two members of the President's
Cabinet: James Monroe, Secretary of State, and William H. Crawford,
Secretary of the Treasury. Governor Tompkins, of New York, was put
forward by enthusiastic partisans from that State, but he was not a
national figure in any sense and commanded no support outside of his
State. Intrigue played a part in this caucus, if contemporary testimony
may be believed. Tradition has it that Martin Van Buren and Peter B.
Porter prevented their New York delegation from voting for Crawford and
thus threw the nomination to Monroe. Governor Tompkins was the choice of
the caucus for Vice-President. No one could safely affirm that these
nominees were the choice of the rank and file of the party. Here and
there public meetings were held to protest against the dictation of the
congressional caucus; but no organized opposition developed. The
campaign proved to be a tame affair. Nowhere was there a real contest.
Only three States, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Delaware, chose
Federalist electors. Not a ripple of excitement stirred the public when
announcement was finally made that Monroe had received 183 electoral
votes and Rufus King, 34. For the fourth time a Virginian had been
raised to the Presidency.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
Of the general histories, only that by McMaster contains any great
amount of information bearing on the economic changes wrought by
war and the preceding period of commercial restriction. Adams
summarizes the economic results of war in a single chapter in the
last volume of his work. K. C. Babcock, _The Rise of American
Nationality_ (in _The American Nation_, vol. 13, 1906), attempts
the same task. Besides the manuals on economic history which have
already been mentioned, there are several excellent volumes
dealing with various phases of national life: such as, D. R.
Dewey, _Financial History of the United States_ (1903); F. W.
Taussig, _Tariff History of the United Stales_ (rev. ed., 1913);
|