FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79  
80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   >>   >|  
nism which the experts condemned as unscientific. [Footnote 1: It is not quite accurate to say that the Romans made a dogma of Epicurus' _ipse dixit_ which destroyed scientific open-mindedness. Vergil uses Posidonius and Zeno as freely as the Stoic Seneca does Epicurus.] Furthermore, Epicureanism provided a view of nature which was apt in the minds of an imaginative poet to lead toward romanticism. Stoicism indeed pretended to be pantheistic, and Wordsworth has demonstrated the value to romanticism of that attitude. But to the clear of vision Stoicism immediately took from nature with one hand what it had given with the other. Invariably, its rule of "follow nature" had to be defined in terms that proved its distrust of what the world called nature. As a matter of fact the Stoic had only scorn for naturalism. Physical man was to him a creature to be chained. Trust not the "scelerata pulpa; peccat et haec, peccat!" cries Persius in terror. The earlier naive animism of Greece and Rome had contained more of aesthetic value, for it was the very spring from which had flowed all the wealth of ancient myths. But the nymphs of that stream were dead, slain by philosophical questioning. The new poetic myth-making that still showed the influence of an old habit of mind was apt to be rather self-conscious and diffident, ending in something resembling the pathetic fallacy. Epicureanism on the other hand by employing the theory of evolution was able to unite man and nature once more. And since man is so self-centered that his imagination refuses to extend sympathetic treatment to nature unless he can feel a vital bond of fellowship with it, the poetry of romance became possible only upon the discovery of that unity. This is doubtless why Lucretius, first of all the Romans, could in his prooemium bring back to nature that sensuousness which through the songs of the troubadours has become the central theme of romantic poetry even to our day. Nam simulac species patefactast verna diei ... Aeriae primum volucres te diva tuumque Significant initum perculsae corda tua vi, Inde ferae pecudes persultant pabula laeta. Vergil, convinced by the same philosophy, expresses himself similarly: Et genus aequoreum, pecudes, pictaeque volucres amor omnibus idem. And again: Avia tum resonant avibus virgulta canoris Et Venerem certis repetunt armenta diebus Parturit almus ager Zepherique treme
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79  
80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
nature
 

volucres

 

romanticism

 
Stoicism
 

pecudes

 

poetry

 

Epicureanism

 

Epicurus

 

peccat

 

Vergil


Romans

 
troubadours
 

discovery

 
central
 
sensuousness
 

Lucretius

 

prooemium

 

doubtless

 

fellowship

 

centered


refuses

 

imagination

 

fallacy

 

employing

 

theory

 
evolution
 

extend

 

sympathetic

 

Zepherique

 

romance


treatment

 

Aeriae

 
expresses
 

armenta

 

similarly

 

diebus

 

Parturit

 

pabula

 

convinced

 

philosophy


aequoreum
 
pictaeque
 

virgulta

 

avibus

 

repetunt

 
canoris
 

certis

 
resonant
 
omnibus
 

persultant