FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   >>  
Raymond has shown (4) how it was that Christian intolerance was gradually broken down. "A Jew may sue at this day, but heretofore he could not; for then they were looked upon as enemies, but now commerce has taught the world more humanity." Lord Coke treated the infidel as one who in law had no right of any kind, with whom no contract need be kept, to whom no debt was payable. The plea of alien infidel as answer to a claim was actually pleaded in court as late as 1737. (5) In a solemn judgment, Lord Coke says (6): "All infidels are in law _perpetui inimici_; for between them, as with the devils whose subjects they be, and the Christian, there is perpetual hostility". Twenty years ago the law of England required the writer of any periodical publication or pamphlet under sixpence in price to give sureties for L800 against the publication of blasphemy. I was the last person prosecuted in 1868 for non-compliance with that law, which was repealed by Mr. Gladstone in 1869. Up till the 23rd December, 1888, an infidel in Scotland was only allowed to enforce any legal claim in court on condition that, if challenged, he denied his infidelity. If he lied and said he was a Christian, he was accepted, despite his lying. If he told the truth and said he was an unbeliever, then he was practically an outlaw, incompetent to give evidence for himself or for any other. Fortunately all this was changed by the Royal assent to the Oaths Act on 24th December. Has not humanity clearly gained a little in this struggle through unbelief? 1 Omychund v. Barker, 1 Atkyns 29. 2 D'Costa. D'Pays, Amb. 228. 3 Hansard cxvi. 381. 4 Lord Raymond's reports 282, Wells v. Williams. 5 Ramkissenseat v. Barker, 1 Atkyns 61. 6 Coke's reports, Calvin's ease. For more than a century and a-half the Roman Catholic had in practice harsher measure dealt out to him by the English Protestant Christian, than was even during that period the fate of the Jew or the unbeliever. If the Roman Catholic would not take the oath of abnegation, which to a sincere Romanist was impossible, he was in effect an outlaw, and the "jury packing" so much complained of to-day in Ireland is one of the habit survivals of the old bad time when Roman Catholics were thus by law excluded from the jury box. The _Scotsman_ of January 5th, 1889, notes that in 1860 the Rev. Dr. Robert Lee, of Greyfriars, gave a course of Sunday evening lectures on Bib
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   >>  



Top keywords:

Christian

 

infidel

 

publication

 

Catholic

 

reports

 

Barker

 
December
 

Atkyns

 
unbeliever
 
Raymond

outlaw

 
humanity
 
Williams
 

changed

 
Ramkissenseat
 

Calvin

 
Omychund
 

Fortunately

 
Hansard
 

gained


struggle

 
assent
 

unbelief

 

sincere

 

Scotsman

 

January

 

excluded

 

Catholics

 

Sunday

 

evening


lectures

 

Greyfriars

 

Robert

 
survivals
 
Protestant
 

English

 

period

 

practice

 

harsher

 

measure


packing

 

complained

 
Ireland
 

effect

 
impossible
 
abnegation
 

Romanist

 
century
 
pleaded
 

answer