FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292  
293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   >>   >|  
which he introduces may be defeated; expediency may even require his removal by his Imperial master; but he has never felt obliged to retire merely by reason of lack of support in the legislative chamber, as would a British or a French minister similarly situated. This does not mean, of course, that the blocking of a governmental programme may not tend to produce the practical effect of a parliamentary vote of "want of confidence." It means simply that the Chancellor, in such a case, is under no admitted obligation to resign. The retirement of Chancellor von Buelow during the crisis of 1908-1909 was more nearly involuntary than that of any one of his three predecessors, but persons most conversant with the circumstances agree that there was involved in it no intention of concession to the parliamentary principle. The Chancellor's fall was, in reality, only his punishment for countenancing the popular indignation occasioned by the Emperor's memorable _Daily Telegraph_ interview, for which the Chancellor himself had been, at least technically, responsible.[310] [Footnote 310: For an excellent discussion of this general subject see W. J. Shepard, Tendencies toward Ministerial Responsibility in Germany, in _American Political Science Review_, Feb., 1911. In the course of an impassioned speech in the Reichstag in 1912, occasioned by a storm of protest against the Emperor's alleged threat to withdraw the newly granted constitution of Alsace-Lorraine, Chancellor von Bethmann-Hollweg stated the theory and fact of the office which he holds in these sentences: "No situation has been created for which I cannot take the responsibility. As long as I stand in this place I shield the Emperor (_trete ich vor den Kaiser_). This not for courtiers' considerations, of which I know nothing, but as in duty bound. When I cannot satisfy this my duty you will see me no more in this place."] There is a clause of the constitution[311] which confers upon the (p. 215) Chancellor the right to delegate the power to represent him to _any other_ member of the Bundesrath; whence it seems to follow that the Chancellor must be himsel
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292  
293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Chancellor

 

Emperor

 

parliamentary

 

constitution

 

occasioned

 
member
 

alleged

 

threat

 
protest
 

Reichstag


Bundesrath
 
withdraw
 

speech

 

Bethmann

 
Hollweg
 

stated

 

Lorraine

 

Alsace

 

granted

 
theory

impassioned

 

Tendencies

 
follow
 

Ministerial

 

Shepard

 

himsel

 
Responsibility
 

Germany

 
Review
 
Science

American

 

Political

 
courtiers
 

considerations

 

Kaiser

 

confers

 

satisfy

 

shield

 

sentences

 
situation

created

 

represent

 

office

 

subject

 

responsibility

 
delegate
 

clause

 

technically

 

confidence

 
effect