FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684  
685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   >>   >|  
ionelle integrale (Paris, 1910); Barriety, La representation proportionelle en Belgique (Paris, 1906); Dubois, La representation proportionelle soumise a l'experience belge (Lille, 1906); and J. Humphreys, Proportional Representation (London, 1911). A careful account is contained in the Report and Evidence of the British Royal Commission on Electoral Systems (1910), Report, Cd. 5,163; Evidence, Cd. 5,352. Useful articles are: E. Mahaim, Proportional Representation and the Debates upon the Electoral Question in Belgium, in _Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science_, May, 1900; E. Van der Smissen, La representation proportionnelle en Belgique et les elections generales de mai 1900, in _Annales des Sciences Politiques_, July-Sept., 1900; and J. Humphreys, Proportional Representation in Belgium, in _Contemporary Review_, Oct., 1908.] *600. The Elections of 1906, 1908, and 1910.*--The first parliamentary election following the adoption of the proportional system--that of May, 1900--left the Catholics with a larger preponderance in the lower chamber than they had dared expect.[766] None the less, the effect of the change was distinctly to revive the all but defunct Liberal party, to stimulate enormously the aspirations of the Socialists, and, in (p. 546) general, to replace the crushing Catholic plurality of former years by a wide distribution of seats among representatives of the various parties and groups. Prior to the election of 1890 the Catholic majority was 32. The election of 1900 left it at 16; that of 1902, at 26; that of 1904, at 20; that of 1906, at 12; that of 1908, at 8; and that of 1910, at 6. Following the elections which took place in five of the nine provinces in 1906, party strength in the Chamber was as follows: Catholics, 89; Liberals, 46; Socialists, 30; Christian Democrats, 1. After the elections in the other four provinces in 1908, it was: Catholics, 87; Liberals, 43; Socialists, 35; Christian Democrats, 1. [Footnote 766: It will be recalled that the term of deputies is four years, half retiring every two
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684  
685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Representation

 

Proportional

 
elections
 

representation

 

election

 
Catholics
 

Socialists

 

Belgium

 
Democrats
 

Electoral


provinces

 

Catholic

 

Liberals

 

Christian

 
Report
 

Evidence

 

proportionelle

 

Belgique

 

Humphreys

 

stimulate


groups

 

majority

 

parties

 

enormously

 

Dubois

 

representatives

 

plurality

 

crushing

 

general

 
replace

soumise

 

distribution

 

experience

 
aspirations
 
Following
 
Footnote
 

ionelle

 

retiring

 
deputies
 

recalled


integrale

 
Liberal
 
strength
 
Barriety
 

Chamber

 

proportionnelle

 
Smissen
 

Science

 

contained

 

generales