FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683  
684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   >>   >|  
9,000 8,000 5,333 4,500 4,500 4,000 3,500 The lowest of these numbers, 3,500, becomes the common divisor, or the "electoral quotient." The number of votes cast for each list is divided by this quotient, and the resulting numbers (fractions being disregarded) indicate the quota of seats to which each of the parties is entitled. In the case in hand the results would be: 16,000 divided by 3,500 = 4 Catholic seats 9,000 divided by 3,500 = 2 Liberal seats 4,500 divided by 3,500 = 1 Socialist seat 3,500 divided by 3,500 = 1 Christian Democrat seat *599. The Making up of the Lists.*--Lists of candidates are made (p. 545) up, and the order in which the names of candidates appear is determined, by the local organizations of the respective parties. In order to be presented to the electorate a list must have the previously expressed support of at least one hundred electors. A candidate may stand as an independent, and his name will appear in a separate "list," providing his candidacy meets the condition that has been mentioned; and it is within the right of any organization or group, political or non-political, to place before the electorate a list. The power of the organization responsible for the presentation of a list to fix the order of candidates' names is not a necessary feature of the proportional system and it has been the object of much criticism, but it is not clear that serious abuse has arisen from it. Candidates whose names stand near the top of the list are, of course, more likely to be elected than those whose names appear further down, for, under the prevailing rules, all votes indicated in the space at the head of a list form a pool from which the candidates on the list draw in succession as many votes as may be necessary to make their individual total equal to the electoral quotient, the process continuing until the pool is exhausted. Only by receiving a large number of individual preferential votes can a candidate be elected to the exclusion of a candidate whose name precedes his.[765] [Footnote 765: Valuable books dealing with proportional representation in Belgium are G. Lachapelle, La representation proportionnelle en France et en Belgique (Paris, 1911); F. Goblet d'Alviella, La representation proportionelle en Belgique, and La representation proport
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683  
684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

divided

 

representation

 
candidates
 

candidate

 

quotient

 
electorate
 

individual

 

proportional

 
elected
 

organization


political

 

electoral

 

number

 

parties

 
Belgique
 

numbers

 

prevailing

 

Candidates

 

Alviella

 

arisen


Goblet

 

proport

 

proportionelle

 

proportionnelle

 

Valuable

 

exhausted

 

dealing

 

process

 

continuing

 
Footnote

preferential

 

receiving

 

criticism

 
precedes
 
Lachapelle
 
France
 

exclusion

 

Belgium

 
succession
 

providing


Liberal

 
Socialist
 
Catholic
 
results
 

Christian

 

Democrat

 
determined
 

Making

 

entitled

 

common