FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  
the names upon the ballots. THE COURT: I have excluded that already. It is not competent. It is proved that they put in votes, and it is proved by one of the ladies that she did vote for a candidate for Congress. MR. VAN VOORHIS: I propose to show by the witness that he didn't know the contents of any ballot, and didn't see it. THE COURT: That will be assumed. He could not do it with any propriety. By MR. VAN VOORHIS: Q. Did either one of the inspectors object to receiving the votes of the women at the polls? A. Yes, sir. Q. Which one? A. William B. Hall. Q. Did he take any part in receiving votes, and, if so, state what part? A. I believe that he took the ballot of one lady, and placed it in the box. I stepped out, I believe, for a few moments. Q. Did it to accommodate you while you stepped out? A. Yes, sir. Q. On the day of registry did the inspectors as a board decide unanimously to register these votes, all three of you consenting? A. We did. Q. When you came to receive the votes, Hall dissented? A. He did, sir. Q. But the other two were a majority, and he was overruled; was this the way it was, or wasn't there anything in form said about it? A. He was overruled; I felt it my duty to take the ballots. Q. In receiving those ballots did you act honestly in accordance with your sense of duty, and in accordance with your best judgment? A. I did. By MR. CROWLEY: Q. All three of the inspectors agreed in receiving these names for registration, did they not? A. Yes, sir. By MR. VAN VOORHIS: Q. I meant to have asked you in reference to the challenges; state whether or not challenges were entered against these voters prior to the day of election? A. There was. Q. On their presenting their votes, what was done? A. I told Miss Anthony, when she offered her vote, that she was challenged; she would have to swear her ballot in if she insisted upon voting; she said she insisted upon voting, and I presented her the Bible and administered to her the preliminary oath, which she took. I turned to the gentleman that challenged her, and asked him if he still insisted upon her taking the general oath. Q. Were questions asked her? A. There were, after taking the preliminary oath. Q. In accordance with the instruction? A. Yes, sir. Q. Go on. A. I turned to the gentleman that challenged her, and asked him if he still insisted on his challenge; he said he did; I
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

insisted

 

receiving

 

ballot

 
challenged
 
accordance
 

inspectors

 

VOORHIS

 

ballots

 
proved
 

challenges


stepped
 

taking

 

preliminary

 

turned

 

gentleman

 

overruled

 

voting

 

registration

 
reference
 

challenge


CROWLEY

 

honestly

 

judgment

 

agreed

 

instruction

 

questions

 

presented

 

general

 

administered

 

offered


election

 

voters

 
entered
 

presenting

 

Anthony

 

propriety

 

assumed

 
object
 
William
 

ladies


candidate

 
competent
 

excluded

 

Congress

 
propose
 
contents
 

witness

 

dissented

 

receive

 

majority