FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  
rdance with the printed instructions furnished them by the Secretary of State. What further can be demanded of them? No United States statute prescribes or attempts to prescribe their duties. They cannot legally be convicted and should be discharged. 3. Because no malice is shown. Whether the women were entitled to have their names registered and to vote, or not, the defendants believed they had such right, and acted in good faith, according to their best judgment, in allowing the registry of their names--and in receiving their votes--and whether they decided right or wrong in point of law, they are not guilty of any criminal offense. The substance of the statute is, as to registration: "If any such officer shall ... _knowingly and wilfully_ register as a voter any person not entitled to be registered, or refuse to so register any person entitled to be registered ... every such person shall be deemed guilty of a crime." Act of May 31, 1870, Sec. 20, As Amended by Act of Feb. 28, 1871, Sec. 1. And as to voting: "If any person shall ... _knowingly and wilfully_ receive the vote of any person not entitled to vote, or refuse to receive the vote of any person entitled to vote ... every such person shall be deemed guilty of a crime." Act of May 31, 1870, Sec. 19. To bring an inspector within either of these sections he must know as _matter of fact_, that the person offering to vote, or to be registered, is not entitled to be registered or to vote. The inspectors were _compelled to decide the question_, and to decide it instantly, with no chance for examination or even consultation--and if they decided in good faith, according to the best of their ability, they are excused, whether they decided correctly or not in point of law. This is too well settled to admit of dispute--settled by authority as well as by the plainest principles of justice and common sense. The law never yet placed a public officer in a position where he would be compelled to decide a doubtful legal question, and to act upon his decision, _subject to the penalty of fine_ or imprisonment if he chanced to err in his decision. All that is ever required of an officer, so placed, whether a judicial or ministerial officer, _so far as is necessary to escape any imputations of crime_, is good faith. Ministerial officers may be required, in some cases to act at their peril as to _civil_ responsibilit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

person

 

entitled

 

registered

 
officer
 

decide

 

guilty

 

decided

 
wilfully
 
knowingly
 

register


refuse

 

statute

 
deemed
 

receive

 

question

 

compelled

 

settled

 

decision

 

required

 

correctly


excused

 

ability

 

officers

 
dispute
 

consultation

 

rdance

 

responsibilit

 

offering

 

inspectors

 
instantly

chance

 

authority

 

examination

 

imputations

 

doubtful

 

position

 
penalty
 
subject
 
chanced
 
public

escape

 
principles
 

imprisonment

 

Ministerial

 

justice

 
common
 

judicial

 

ministerial

 
plainest
 
judgment