FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  
high, and the parties were for a long time so unyielding, that fears were entertained of a sudden dissolution of the convention. Sec.7. It became evident that the question could be settled only by compromise. The northern states consented that in ascertaining the number of persons to be taken as the basis of apportionment, three-fifths of the slaves should be added to the number of free persons. And as these states had opposed the computation of any slaves in fixing a rule of apportionment, on the ground that slaves are property, and that no property in these states entitled its owners to representation, the southern states consented, on their part, that _direct taxes_ should be apportioned on the same basis as representatives. Sec.8. To illustrate this rule by an example: Suppose a state to contain 600,000 free persons, and 500,000 slaves. Adding three-fifths of the number of slaves, (300,000) to the number of free persons, gives 900,000 as the number of the representative population: and the state would be entitled to _three_ representatives for every _two_ that a state would have which contained 600,000 free inhabitants and no slaves. So in apportioning taxes according to population, the state in the case we have supposed, would have to raise _three_ dollars for every _two_ that it would raise if no slaves were counted. Sec.9. But the advantages of this arrangement are more unequal than may at first sight appear, or than was anticipated by the framers of the constitution. The benefits are chiefly on the side of the slaveholding states. In the first place, two-fifths of a large class of property in these states is exempt from taxation, while _all_ the property in the free states is liable to taxation. Of this the framers were aware. But they did not foresee the fact, that the laying of direct taxes would be unnecessary, and that the slave states would consequently escape taxation for their slaves. Only three direct taxes have been laid; and it is not probable that another will become necessary; the treasury being supplied from other sources, chiefly by duties on imports. Sec.10. Now, although nothing is gained by the slave states, nor is anything lost by the free states, by the exemption of the two-fifths of the slaves from taxation, since direct taxes are unnecessary; there is a great gain to the slave states, which have between thirty and forty representatives for what their laws hold to be "property to all
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

states

 
slaves
 

number

 
property
 

fifths

 

persons

 

taxation

 

direct

 

representatives

 

population


entitled

 

unnecessary

 
chiefly
 

framers

 

consented

 

apportionment

 
constitution
 

anticipated

 
benefits
 

slaveholding


liable
 

exempt

 

exemption

 

gained

 

thirty

 

imports

 

probable

 

escape

 

laying

 

sources


duties

 

supplied

 

treasury

 
foresee
 
apportioning
 

parties

 

ascertaining

 
opposed
 

computation

 

owners


representation

 

southern

 

ground

 

fixing

 

northern

 
convention
 

dissolution

 
sudden
 

evident

 

question