FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   >>  
No immunity was granted even to men who had fought on the English side, even to men who had lined the walls of Londonderry and rushed on the Irish guns at Newton Butler. In some cases the Commons showed indulgence; but their indulgence was not less unjustifiable, nor of less pernicious example, than their severity. The ancient rule, a rule which is still strictly maintained, and which cannot be relaxed without danger of boundless profusion and shameless jobbery, is that whatever the Parliament grants shall be granted to the Sovereign, and that no public bounty shall be bestowed on any private person except by the Sovereign. The Lower House now, contemptuously disregarding both principles and precedents, took on itself to carve estates out of the forfeitures for persons whom it was inclined to favour. To the Duke of Ormond especially, who ranked among the Tories and was distinguished by his dislike of the foreigners, marked partiality was shown. Some of his friends, indeed, hoped that they should be able to insert in the bill a clause bestowing on him all the confiscated estates in the county of Tipperary. But they found that it would be prudent in them to content themselves with conferring on him a boon smaller in amount, but equally objectionable in principle. He had owed very large debts to persons who had forfeited to the Crown all that belonged to them. Those debts were therefore now due from him to the Crown. The House determined to make him a present of the whole, that very House which would not consent to leave a single acre to the general who had stormed Athlone, who had gained the battle of Aghrim, who had entered Galway in triumph, and who had received the submission of Limerick. That a bill so violent, so unjust, and so unconstitutional would pass the Lords without considerable alteration was hardly to be expected. The ruling demagogues, therefore, resolved to join it with the bill which granted to the Crown a land tax of two shillings in the pound for the service of the next year, and thus to place the Upper House under the necessity of either passing both bills together without the change of a word, or rejecting both together, and leaving the public creditor unpaid and the nation defenceless. There was great indignation among the Peers. They were not indeed more disposed than the Commons to approve of the manner in which the Irish forfeitures had been granted away; for the antipathy to the foreigners
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   >>  



Top keywords:
granted
 

forfeitures

 
public
 

persons

 
estates
 

foreigners

 

Sovereign

 
Commons
 

indulgence

 

forfeited


received
 

Galway

 

triumph

 

submission

 

principle

 
determined
 

Limerick

 
entered
 
stormed
 

general


single

 

Athlone

 

battle

 

consent

 

gained

 

belonged

 

present

 

Aghrim

 

leaving

 

rejecting


creditor
 

unpaid

 

nation

 
passing
 

change

 

defenceless

 

manner

 

approve

 
antipathy
 
disposed

indignation

 

necessity

 
expected
 

ruling

 

demagogues

 

resolved

 

alteration

 

considerable

 

unjust

 

unconstitutional