FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>   >|  
and rapid growth of the unit of production. And here machinery is the chief external cause. Gigantic railways and steamship companies are the successors of stage coach businesses and small shippers. The size and value of the modern cotton factory, iron works, sugar refinery, or brewery are incomparably greater than the units of which these industries were composed a century and a half ago. In certain highly-machined industries the size of the unit is so enlarged that the number of businesses engaged in turning out the ever-growing output is actually diminishing. Among textile industries the spinning mills of England and Wales show a marked diminution in numbers between 1870 and 1890, while a similar movement in weaving mills is only retarded by the capacity of small sweating masters to compete with the more developed factories in certain minor branches, such as tape manufacture, and by the survival of the home worker owning his loom and hiring his power in such trades as the ribbon weaving of Coventry.[100] The following statistics[101] of the cotton and woollen industries in Great Britain serve to illustrate the growing size of the unit of production in the representative branches of textile work:-- KEY: A: Spinning. B: Weaving. C: Spinning and Weaving. D: Others. E: Total. F: Spinning. G: Doubling. H: Power-Looms. COTTON. NO. OF MILLS. NO. OF SPINDLES. A B C D E F G H 1870 1108 693 532 150 2483 33,995,221 3,723,537 440,676 1890 935 990 438 175 2538 40,511,934 3,992,885 615,714 WOOLLEN. 1870 648 109 860 212 1829 2,531,768 160,993 48,140 1890 494 124 895 280 1793 2,107,209 299,793 61,831 This increase of the number of spindles and looms in the average textile mill is more significant when the "speeding up" of modern machinery is taken into account. The increased size of the unit of industry as measured by productivity is even greater than appears from the statistics above quoted. Schulze-Gaevernitz points out that in the thirty years between 1856 and 1885, while the factories in cotton spinning and weaving only increased from 2210 to 2633, the number of spindles increased from 28,010,217 to 44,348,921, the number of looms from 298,847 to 560,955, and that since both spindles and loom
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

number

 

industries

 
cotton
 

weaving

 
spindles
 

textile

 

increased

 

Spinning

 

statistics

 

machinery


businesses

 
factories
 

spinning

 

growing

 
production
 
Weaving
 
modern
 

branches

 

greater

 
WOOLLEN

thirty
 

points

 

Gaevernitz

 

appears

 
quoted
 
Schulze
 

productivity

 

measured

 

account

 

industry


speeding
 

increase

 

average

 

significant

 

woollen

 

century

 

composed

 

incomparably

 

highly

 
machined

output

 
diminishing
 
turning
 

enlarged

 

engaged

 
brewery
 

Gigantic

 
railways
 

steamship

 
external