FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38  
39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>   >|  
te in which contracts cannot be enforced is not a state of legal commerce." [Sidenote: No Trade permitted except under Royal licence.] "Upon these and similar grounds, it has been the established rule of this court, confirmed by the judgment of the supreme court, that a trading with the enemy, except under a Royal Licence, subjects the property to confiscation. "Where the Government has authorised, under sanction of an Act of Parliament, a _homeward trade_ from the enemy's possessions, but has not specifically protected an _outward_ _trade_ to the same, though intimately connected with that homeward trade, and almost necessary to its existence, the rule has been enforced, where strong claim not merely of convenience, but almost of necessity, excused it on behalf of the individual. "It has been enforced, where cargoes have been laden before the war, but where the parties have not used all possible diligence to countermand the voyage after the first notice of hostilities.[23] "In the last war between England and America, a case occurred in which an American citizen had purchased a quantity of goods within the British territory, a long time previous to the war, and had deposited them upon an island near the frontier; upon the breaking out of hostilities, his agents had hired a vessel to proceed to the spot, to bring away the goods; on her return she was captured, and with the cargo, condemned as prize of war."[24] So also, where goods were purchased, some time before the war, by the agent of an American citizen in Great Britain, but not shipped until nearly a year after the declaration of hostilities, they were pronounced liable to confiscation.[25] Where property is to be withdrawn from the country of the enemy, it is the more satisfactory and guarded proceeding on the part of the _British_ merchant to apply to his own Government for the special importation of the article; it is indeed the only safe way in which parties can proceed.[26] [Sidenote: Subjects of an Ally may not trade with the Enemy.] During a Conjoint War no Subject of an Ally can trade with the common enemy without liability to forfeiture in the prize courts of the Ally, of all his property engaged in such trade. As the former rule can be relaxed only by permission of the Sovran power of the state, so this can be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38  
39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

property

 

enforced

 

hostilities

 

homeward

 

purchased

 

citizen

 
British
 

proceed

 
American
 
parties

Government

 
Sidenote
 
confiscation
 

courts

 
shipped
 

Britain

 
engaged
 

condemned

 
Sovran
 

vessel


return

 
relaxed
 

permission

 

captured

 

liability

 

importation

 

article

 

special

 

Subjects

 

During


Conjoint

 

merchant

 

Subject

 
common
 
pronounced
 

forfeiture

 

declaration

 

liable

 

guarded

 

proceeding


satisfactory

 

withdrawn

 
country
 

possessions

 
specifically
 
Parliament
 

subjects

 
authorised
 
sanction
 

protected