FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87  
88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>  
ce of Europe, or at least of several maritime states of Europe, was to confiscate them entirely. A century has now elapsed since this claim has been asserted by some of them. A more mitigated practice has prevailed in later times, of holding such cargoes subject only to a right of pre-emption; that is, to a right of purchase, upon a reasonable compensation, to the individual whose property is thus diverted. This claim on the part of the belligerent cannot go beyond cargoes avowedly bound to the enemy's ports, or suspected on just grounds to have a concealed destination of that kind. The neutral can only expect a reasonable compensation. He cannot look to the price he would obtain in the enemy's port. An enemy, distressed by famine, may be driven by his necessities to pay a famine price; but it does not follow that the belligerent, in the exercise of his rights of war, is to pay the price of distress."[173] "It is a mitigated exercise of war, on which any purchase is made; and no rule has established that such a purchase shall be regulated exactly on the same terms of profit which would have followed the adventure, if no such exercise of war had intervened; it is a _reasonable_ indemnification, and a _fair profit_, that is due, reference being had to the price originally paid by the exporter, and the expenses he has incurred." [Sidenote: Neutral Vessels Transporting Enemy's Forces.] Transporting the _Enemy's Forces_, subjects a Neutral Vessel to confiscation, if captured by the opposite belligerent. Sir Wm. Scott says, in the leading case on this subject-- "That a vessel hired, by the enemy, for the conveyance of military persons is to be considered _as a transport_, subject to condemnation, has been in a recent case, held by this Court, and on other occasions.[174] What is the number of military persons that shall constitute such a case it may be difficult to define. In the former cases there were many, in the present they are fewer in number; number alone is an insignificant circumstance in the considerations on which the principles of law on this subject are built; since fewer persons of high quality and character may be of more importance than a much greater number of persons of lower condition. To send out _one veteran general_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87  
88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>  



Top keywords:
subject
 
persons
 
number
 
exercise
 

reasonable

 

purchase

 

belligerent

 

famine

 

profit

 

Forces


Europe

 

military

 

compensation

 

mitigated

 

Neutral

 

Transporting

 

cargoes

 
considered
 
Sidenote
 

conveyance


expenses

 

condemnation

 
recent
 

exporter

 

incurred

 

transport

 
leading
 

captured

 

opposite

 
confiscation

Vessel

 
subjects
 

vessel

 

Vessels

 
constitute
 

quality

 

character

 

importance

 

considerations

 

principles


greater

 
veteran
 
general
 

condition

 

circumstance

 

insignificant

 

difficult

 

define

 

occasions

 
present