FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  
g horizontal septate basidia in closed receptacles; and (4) Tremellineae, having vertically divided basidia borne in gymnocarpous receptacles--that is, those in which the hymenium is exposed while the spores are growing. The Autobasidiomycetes are characterized by undivided basidia, bearing spores only at the apex. This group is subdivided into three sections: (1) Dacryomycetes, which includes the lowest of the Tremelloid forms, with club-shaped basidia, nearly approaching the true Hymenomycetal type, together with several groups of minor import; (2) Gasteromycetes; and (3) Hymenomycetes, with Phalloideae placed in the group as a subsection of Gasteromycetes. The above can only be considered as a very brief abstract of the system of classification proposed by Dr. Brefield, but it will serve to give some idea of the principle on which the system is based, which is sufficient for our present purpose. Those who wish to study the system in detail will find it treated in a comprehensive manner in Dr. Von Tavel's summary as it appears in the _Vergleichende Morphologie der Pilze_, Jena, 1892. CONIOMYCETES AND HYPHOMYCETES. In the original classification of Fries two of the primary divisions of the sporiferous Fungi were termed, respectively, _Coniomycetes_ and _Hyphomycetes_. This arrangement was accepted by Berkeley, the term _Coniomycetes_ being applied to all fungi in which the naked spores, appearing like an impalpable dust, were the principal feature of the plant, and the term _Hyphomycetes_ to fungi in which the threads or hyphae bearing the spores were the most conspicuous feature. Coniomycetes, as broadly interpreted by Berkeley and other mycologists of his day, included the Uredineae or "rust fungi," the Ustilagines or "smut fungi," the Sphaeropsideae, and the Melanconieae. This arrangement was very unsatisfactory on account of the distinctively different character of the methods of reproduction of the respective groups, and they have since been disassociated and by some authors ranked as distinct orders or families. Others combine Uredinei and Ustilaginei in one group under the name Hypodermei. Familiar examples of Uredinei are seen in the rust of the Barberry leaf, etc., and of the Ustilaginei in the "smut" of corn and the "bunt" of wheat. Some authors combine the Sphaeropsideae with the closely allied Melanconieae. M. C. Cooke contends that the _Sphaeropsideae_ should be considered apart fro
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
spores
 

basidia

 

system

 

Coniomycetes

 

Sphaeropsideae

 

Melanconieae

 
classification
 
Gasteromycetes
 

authors

 
groups

feature

 

Uredinei

 
combine
 

Ustilaginei

 

Hyphomycetes

 

arrangement

 

considered

 

receptacles

 
bearing
 
Berkeley

interpreted

 

mycologists

 
accepted
 
applied
 

termed

 

primary

 

divisions

 
sporiferous
 

appearing

 

threads


hyphae

 

conspicuous

 

principal

 

impalpable

 
broadly
 

Barberry

 
Hypodermei
 

Familiar

 
examples
 

contends


closely

 

allied

 

character

 
methods
 

reproduction

 

distinctively

 

account

 

Uredineae

 

Ustilagines

 
unsatisfactory