FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264  
265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   >>   >|  
specific heat_ over the range 18 deg. to _t_. The specific heat itself can be deduced only by differentiating the curve of observation, which greatly increases the uncertainty. The peculiar advantage of the electric method of Callendar and Barnes, already referred to, is that the specific heat itself is determined over a range of 8 deg. to 10 deg. at each point, by adding accurately measured quantities of heat to the water at the desired temperature in an isothermal enclosure, under perfectly steady conditions, without any possibility of evaporation or loss of heat in transference. These experiments, which have been extended by Barnes over the whole range 0 deg. to 100 deg., agree very well with Rowland and Griffiths in the rate of variation at 20 deg. C., but show a rather flat minimum of specific heat in the neighbourhood of 38 deg. to 40 deg. C. At higher points the rate of variation is very similar to that of Regnault's curve, but taking the specific heat at 20 deg. as the standard of reference, the actual values are nearly 0.56% less than Regnault's. It appears probable that his values for higher temperatures may be adopted with this reduction, which is further confirmed by the results of Reynolds and Moorby, and by those of Ludin. According to the electric method, the whole range of variation of the specific heat between 10 deg. and 80 deg. is only 0.5%. Comparatively simple formulae, therefore, suffice for its expression to 1 in 10,000, which is beyond the limits of accuracy of the observations. It is more convenient in practice to use a few simple formulae, than to attempt to represent the whole range by a single complicated expression:-- Below 20 deg. C. s = 0.9982 + 0.0000045(t - 40)^2 - 0.0000005(t - 20)^3. From 20 deg. to 60 deg., s = 0.9982 + 0.0000045(t - 40)^2 (5). / s = 0.9944 + .00004t + 0.0000009t^2 Above 60 deg. to 200 deg. < (Regnault corrd.) \ s = 1.000 + 0.00022(t - 60), (Bosscha corrd.) The addition of the cubic term below 20 deg. is intended to represent the somewhat more rapid change near the freezing-point. This effect is probably due, as suggested by Rowland, to the presence of a certain proportion of ice molecules in the liquid, which is also no doubt the cause of the anomalous expansion. Above 60 deg. C. Regnault's formula is adopted, t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264  
265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
specific
 

Regnault

 

variation

 

Rowland

 
represent
 
0000045
 

adopted

 

expression

 

higher

 
formulae

simple

 

values

 

method

 

electric

 

Barnes

 

attempt

 

single

 

0000005

 

deduced

 
practice

differentiating
 

complicated

 

uncertainty

 

suffice

 

peculiar

 

Comparatively

 

advantage

 

increases

 

accuracy

 
observations

limits

 
greatly
 
observation
 

convenient

 
00004t
 
proportion
 
presence
 

suggested

 
molecules
 

liquid


anomalous

 
expansion
 

formula

 

effect

 

Bosscha

 

addition

 

0000009t

 

change

 

freezing

 

intended