FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262  
263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   >>   >|  
can be readily and accurately tested. The absolute value of the E.M.F. of the Clark cells employed was determined with a special form of electrodynamometer (Callendar, _Phil. Trans._ A. 313, p. 81), and found to be 1.4334 volts, assuming the ohm to be correct. Assuming this value, the result found by this method for the specific heat of water at 20 deg. C. agrees with that of Rowland within the probable limits of error. S 15. _Variation of Specific Heat of Water._--The question of the variation of the specific heat of water has a peculiar interest and importance in connexion with the choice of a thermal unit. Many of the uncertainties in the reduction of older experiments, such as those of Regnault, arise from uncertainty in regard to the unit in terms of which they are expressed, which again depends on the scale of the particular thermometer employed in the investigation. The first experiments of any value were those of Regnault in 1847 on the specific heat of water between 110 deg. C. and 192 deg. C. They were conducted on a very large scale by the method of mixture, but showed discrepancies of the order of 0.5%, and the calculated results in many cases do not agree with the data. This may be due merely to deficient explanation of details of tabulation. We may probably take the tabulated values as showing correctly the rate of variation between 110 deg. and 190 deg. C., but the values in terms of any particular thermal unit must remain uncertain to at least 0.5% owing to the uncertainties of the thermometry. Regnault himself adopted the formula, s = 1 + 0.00004t + 0.0000009t^2 (Regnault), (3) for the specific heat _s_ at any temperature _t_ C. in terms of the specific heat at 0 deg. C. taken as the standard. This formula has since been very generally applied over the whole range 0 deg. to 200 deg. C., but the experiments could not in reality give any information with regard to the specific heat at temperatures below 100 deg. C. The linear formula proposed by J. Bosscha from an independent reduction of Regnault's experiments is probably within the limits of accuracy between 100 deg. and 200 deg. C., so far as the mean rate of variation is concerned, but the absolute values require reduction. It may be written-- s = S_100 + .00023(t - 100) (Bosscha-Regnault) (4). The work of L. Pfaundler and H. Platter, of G.A. Hirn, o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262  
263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
specific
 

Regnault

 

experiments

 

formula

 
reduction
 
values
 

variation

 

limits

 

Bosscha

 
uncertainties

employed

 

absolute

 

regard

 

method

 

thermal

 

adopted

 

details

 

tabulation

 

explanation

 
deficient

tabulated
 

uncertain

 

remain

 

showing

 

correctly

 

thermometry

 

concerned

 

require

 

independent

 
accuracy

written

 
Platter
 
Pfaundler
 

proposed

 
standard
 
generally
 
temperature
 

0000009t

 
applied
 

temperatures


linear

 
information
 

reality

 

00004t

 

thermometer

 

correct

 

Assuming

 

assuming

 

result

 

Variation