FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  
tmas-box which is to be the reward of his "early minstrelsy." The curfew is rung at Bewdley in Worcestershire. At Durham the curfew is rung (on the great bell of the cathedral) at nine o'clock. It is therefore of the same use to the students of the University of Durham as "Tom" is to the students of the University of Oxford, viz. it marks the closing of the college gates. CUTHBERT BEDE, B.A. * * * * * PHOTOGRAPHIC CORRESPONDENCE. _Photographic Engraving._--I inclose a copy of a little book for your inspection, which is remarkable only in this, that the illustrations are produced by photography. The general theory of the method is this: a piece of glass is covered with a uniform thin coating of some substance, so as to be opaque or semi-opaque (the substance should be light coloured), and a design is etched on it with a needle. From this _negative_ positive pictures are printed photographically. As to details, the prints of the mice (p. 46.) and the cat (p. 37.) are from a glass coated with iodized collodion rendered sensitive, exposed to faint light for a short time and developed. In this method, the glass should be heated; and the collodion _burnished_ with the hand, to make it adhere well.[5] The owl (p. 22.) and the stork (p. 10.) are from a glass coated with iodized collodion "rendered sensitive" only, and not developed so as to be only semi-opaque. On this high lights were put with opaque white, and darks were etched out. This has the effect of a tinted lithograph, but requires much more care in printing than the former method, in order to hit the right tint; so much so, that I have usually printed the stork faintly so as not to show the "tint" at all. The frontispiece is from a paper negative, a method much more troublesome and tedious than either of the others, both in preparation of the negative and in printing. I have lately tried gilt glass to etch upon. This would be excellent, were it not most painful to the eyes. And more than two years ago, I prepared a negative by painting whites with water colour on transparent glass with moderate success. I have recently received from Rome a positive printed from a negative on smoked glass, the subject being a mule's head. Of all the methods I have tried, the best is the first mentioned; and it seems to me easier than any species of engraving. Query, What is the best coating for the glass; and what will be the cost of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  



Top keywords:

negative

 

method

 

opaque

 

collodion

 

printed

 
positive
 

coating

 

substance

 

iodized

 

etched


coated
 

curfew

 

developed

 

rendered

 

University

 

students

 

printing

 
sensitive
 

Durham

 

troublesome


tedious

 

requires

 

tinted

 

effect

 

lithograph

 

faintly

 
frontispiece
 
methods
 

received

 
smoked

subject

 

mentioned

 

engraving

 
easier
 

species

 

recently

 

success

 

excellent

 
painful
 

lights


preparation

 

colour

 

transparent

 

moderate

 

whites

 

painting

 
prepared
 
Photographic
 

Engraving

 

inclose