FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  
Tudor Shakespeare. Other plays assigned, without grounds, to Shakespeare by late seventeenth-century booksellers are _The Merry Devil of Edmonton, The Arraignment of Paris, Fair Em, Mucedorus_, and _The Birth of Merlin_. A few other anonymous plays have been ascribed to Shakespeare by modern critics. Of chief note are _Arden of Feversham_, 1592, first attributed to Shakespeare by Edward Jacob in 1770; _Edward III_, 1596, included with other false attributions to Shakespeare in a bookseller's list of 1659, and edited and assigned to Shakespeare by Capell in 1760; _Sir Thomas More_, an old play of about 1587, preserved in manuscript until edited by Dyce in 1844 and assigned to Shakespeare by Richard Simpson in 1871. There is no evidence for the ascription of various portions of these plays to Shakespeare, except that certain passages seem to some critics characteristic of him. But at the date when the three plays were written his style had not attained its characteristic individuality; and the assignment of these anonymous plays to any particular author neglects the obvious fact that many writers of that period present similar traits of versification and imagery. The attribution to Shakespeare of the Countess of Salisbury episode in _Edward III_, parts of the insurrection scenes in _Sir Thomas More_, and a few passages in _Arden of Feversham_ has scarcely any warrant beyond the enthusiastic admiration of certain critics for these passages. Thus only one play of the Shakespeare Apocrypha has any considerable claim to admission into the canon. The evidence for his participation in _The Two Noble Kinsmen_ is about as strong as in _Pericles_, and the part assigned to him is fairly comparable with his contribution to _Henry VIII_. An account of the Shakespeare Apocrypha is, however, incomplete without reference to the forgeries of documents or plays. Theobald published _Double Falsehood_ in 1728, as based on a seventeenth-century manuscript which he conjectured to be by Shakespeare. John Jordan, a resident of Stratford, forged the will of Shakespeare's father, and probably some other papers in his _Collections_, 1780; William Henry Ireland, with the aid of his father, produced in 1796 a volume of forged papers purporting to relate to Shakespeare's career, and on April 2, 1796, Sheridan and Kemble presented at Drury Lane the tragedy of _Vortigern_, really by Ireland, but said by him to have been found among Shakespeare's
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 

assigned

 

Edward

 

critics

 

passages

 

forged

 
Apocrypha
 

edited

 

father

 

papers


manuscript
 

characteristic

 

evidence

 

Thomas

 

century

 

seventeenth

 

anonymous

 

Ireland

 
Feversham
 

Pericles


Kinsmen

 
strong
 

contribution

 

Vortigern

 

account

 
fairly
 

comparable

 
enthusiastic
 

admiration

 

warrant


scenes

 

scarcely

 

tragedy

 

participation

 

admission

 

considerable

 

incomplete

 
purporting
 

insurrection

 

conjectured


relate
 
Jordan
 

resident

 
William
 
Collections
 
volume
 

Stratford

 

produced

 

career

 

forgeries