FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123  
124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   >>   >|  
or of the larger portion is Fletcher. The attribution of the non-Fletcherian part to Shakespeare has been upheld by Lamb, Coleridge, De Quincey, Spalding (in a notable Letter on Shakespeare's Authorship of _The Two Noble Kinsmen_, 1833), Furness, and Littledale (who edited the play for _The New Shakespeare Society_, Series II, 1, 8, 15, London, 1876-1885); but there are still many critics who do not believe that Shakespeare had any part in the play. This question will probably always remain a matter of opinion; but the evidence of various verse tests confirms esthetic judgment in assigning about two fifths of the verse to Shakespeare. The Shakespearean portion, here and there possibly touched by Fletcher, includes, I. i; I. ii; I. iii; I. iv. 1-28; III. i; III. ii; V. i. 17-73; V. iii. 1-104; V. iv, and perhaps the prose II. i and IV. iii. The dance in the play is borrowed from an anti-masque in Beaumont's _Masque of the Inner Temple and Gray's Inn_, presented at court, February 20, 1613. This fixes the date of composition for the play in 1613, the same year as _Henry VIII_, on which it is now generally agreed that Shakespeare and Fletcher collaborated. On both of the plays the collaboration seems to have been direct; _i.e._, after making a fairly detailed outline, each writer took certain scenes, and, to all intents, completed these scenes after his own fashion. One other play must be mentioned in connection with _The Two Noble Kinsmen_. _Cardenio_, entered on the Stationers' Register, 1653, was described as "by Fletcher and Shakespeare." It seems probably identical with a _Cardenno_ acted at court by the King's men in May, 1613, and a _Cardenna_ in June, 1613. Attempts have been made to connect it with _Double Falsehood_, assigned to Shakespeare by Theobald on its publication in 1728. [Page Heading: Last Ascriptions] Other non-extant plays ascribed to Shakespeare after 1642 require no attention, nor do a number of Elizabethan plays assigned to him in certain of their later quartos. Among these are _The Troublesome Reign of King John_, on which Shakespeare's _King John_ was based; _The First Part of The Contention_, and (the Second Part) _The True Tragedy of Richard Duke of York_ (versions of _2 Henry VI_ and _3 Henry VI_); and _The Taming of a Shrew_, the basis of Shakespeare's play. The relation of Shakespeare's plays to these earlier versions is discussed in the introductions to the respective volumes of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123  
124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 

Fletcher

 

assigned

 

scenes

 

versions

 

portion

 
Kinsmen
 

Cardenno

 

identical

 

Cardenna


outline
 

detailed

 

writer

 

intents

 

completed

 

mentioned

 

connection

 

fashion

 
Register
 

Stationers


Cardenio

 
entered
 

ascribed

 

Second

 

Contention

 
Tragedy
 

Richard

 
quartos
 

Troublesome

 

discussed


earlier

 

introductions

 

respective

 

volumes

 

relation

 

Taming

 

publication

 
Heading
 

Theobald

 

connect


Double
 
Falsehood
 

Ascriptions

 
number
 
Elizabethan
 
attention
 

extant

 

fairly

 

require

 

Attempts