FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>  
way that the author would have no excuse for writing to the _Times_ about it. He was overwhelmingly complimentary. But along came the usual letter by return of post. Mr. Untermeyer asked for enough space to "diverge from the critique at one point." He said the review was too fulsome. I wish Don Marquis kept a diary, but I am quite sure he doesn't. Don is too--well, I was going to say he is too--but after all he has a perfect right to be that way. It's rather an important thing. Every one knows the fascination exerted by personal details of authors' lives. Every one has hustled to the Cafe de la Source in Paris because R.L.S. once frequented it, or to Allaire's in New York because O. Henry wrote it up in one of his tales, and that sort of thing. People like to know all the minutiae concerning their favorite author. It is not sufficient to know (let us say) that Murray Hill or some one of that sort, once belonged to the Porrier's Corner Club. One wants to know where the Porrier's Corner Club was, and who were the members, and how he got there, and what he got there, and so forth. One wants to know where Murray Hill (I take his name only as a symbol) buys his cigars, and where he eats lunch, and what he eats, whether pigeon potpie with iced tea or hamburg steak and "coffee with plenty." It is all these intimate details that the public has thirst for. Now the point I want to make is this. Here, all around us, is fine doings (as Murray Hill would put it), the jolliest literary hullabaloo going. Some of the writers round about--Arthur Guiterman or Tom Masson or Witter Bynner or Tom Daly, or some of these chaps now sitting down to combination-plate luncheons and getting off all manner of merry quips and confidential matters--some of these chaps may be famous some day (posterity is so undiscriminating) and all that savory personal stuff will have evaporated from our memories. The world of bookmen is in great need of a new crop of intimists, or whatever you call them. Barbellion chaps. Henry Ryecrofts. We need a chiel taking notes somewhere. Now if you really jot down the merry gossip, and make bright little pen portraits, and tell just what happens, it will not only afford you a deal of discreet amusement, but the diary you keep will reciprocate. In your older years it will keep you. _Harper's Magazine_ will undoubtedly want to publish it, forty years from now. If that is too late to keep you, it will help to keep your
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118  
119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>  



Top keywords:

Murray

 

Porrier

 

Corner

 

details

 

personal

 

author

 
confidential
 

matters

 

review

 

manner


famous
 

evaporated

 

memories

 

posterity

 

undiscriminating

 

savory

 

luncheons

 

writers

 
Arthur
 

hullabaloo


jolliest

 
literary
 

Guiterman

 

fulsome

 

sitting

 
combination
 

Untermeyer

 
Masson
 

Witter

 

Bynner


undoubtedly

 

portraits

 

gossip

 

bright

 

afford

 

critique

 

Harper

 
reciprocate
 

discreet

 

amusement


publish
 
intimists
 

doings

 
bookmen
 
taking
 
Barbellion
 

Ryecrofts

 

Magazine

 

overwhelmingly

 

perfect