FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303  
1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   >>   >|  
examples as this: 'I expected _him_ to be present.' We will change the expression: 'He was expected to be present.' _All will admit_ that _to be_ is governed by _was expected_. The same verb that governs it in the passive voice, governs it in the active."--_Sanborn's Gram._, p. 144. So do our _professed grammarians_ differ about the government of the infinitive, even in _the most common_ constructions of it! Often, however, it makes but little difference in regard to the sense, which of the two words is considered the governing or antecedent term; but where the preposition is excluded, the construction seems to imply some immediate influence of the finite verb upon the infinitive. OBS. 5.--The _extent_ of this influence, or of such government, has never yet been clearly determined. "This _irregularity_," says _Murray_, "extends only to _active or neuter_ verbs: ['active _and_ neuter verbs,' says _Fisk_:] for all the verbs above mentioned, when made _passive_, require the preposition _to_ before the following verb: as, 'He was seen _to_ go;' 'He was heard _to_ speak;' 'They were bidden _to_ be upon their guard.'"--_Murray's Gram._, p. 183. Fisk adds with no great accuracy "In the _past_ and _future_ tenses of the active voice also, these verbs generally require the sign _to_, to be prefixed to the following verbs; as, 'You _have dared to proceed_ without authority;' 'They _will_ not _dare to attack_ you.'"--_Gram. Simplified_, p. 125. What these gentlemen here call "_neuter verbs_," are only the two words _dare_ and _need_, which are, in most cases, active, though not always transitive; unless the infinitive itself can make them so--an inconsistent doctrine of theirs which I have elsewhere refuted. (See Obs. 3rd on Rule 5th.) These two verbs take the infinitive after them without the preposition, only when they are intransitive; while all the rest seem to have this power, only when they are transitive. If there are any exceptions, they shall presently be considered. A more particular examination of the construction proper for the infinitive after each of these eight verbs, seems necessary for a right understanding of the rule. OBS. 6.--Of the verb BID. This verb, in any of its tenses, when it commands an action, usually governs an object and also an infinitive, which come together; as, "Thou _bidst_ the _world adore_."--_Thomson_. "If the prophet _had bid thee do_ some great thing."--_2 Kings_, v, 13. But when it mean
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303  
1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

infinitive

 

active

 
governs
 

expected

 

preposition

 

neuter

 

construction

 

considered

 

influence

 
tenses

transitive
 

require

 

Murray

 
government
 
present
 

passive

 

examples

 
intransitive
 

expression

 
change

refuted

 
exceptions
 
inconsistent
 

doctrine

 

Thomson

 

prophet

 
object
 

action

 

proper

 
examination

presently
 

commands

 

understanding

 

determined

 

irregularity

 

extends

 

mentioned

 

differ

 

grammarians

 
professed

extent
 
excluded
 

antecedent

 

regard

 

governing

 
difference
 

constructions

 

common

 

finite

 

proceed