FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>  
to grasp the nettle. In his words the true position is quite clearly set forth. If Inter-State Law is to become a reality we must "be sure to go far enough." There is no half-way house between Law and no Law, between Government and no Government, between Responsibility and no Responsibility. If the new Concert is to be effective it must be able to compel the submission of all "awkward problems" and causes of quarrel to its permanent Tribunal at the Hague or elsewhere; and it must be able to enforce the decision of its tribunal, employing for the purpose, if necessary, the armed forces of the signatory Powers as an international police. "Out-voted minorities must accustom themselves to giving way." It is a bland and easy phrase; but it involves the whole question of world-government. "Men must accustom themselves not to demand an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth," the earliest law-givers might have said, when the State first intervened between individuals to make itself responsible for public order. Peace between the Powers, as between individuals, is, no doubt, a habit to which cantankerous Powers "must accustom themselves." But they will be sure to do so if there is a Law, armed with the force to be their schoolmaster towards peaceable habits. In other words, they will do so because they have surrendered one of the most vital elements in the independent life of a State--the right of conducting its own policy--to the jurisdiction of a higher Power. An Inter-State Concert, with a Judiciary of its own and an Army and Navy under its own orders, is, in fact, not an Inter-State Concert at all; it is a new State: it is, in fact, the World-State. There is no middle course between Law and no Law: and the essence of Statehood, as we have seen, is a Common Law. Will this new State have the other attributes of Government--a Common Legislature and a Common Executive--as well as a Common Judiciary? Let us go back to Professor Murray's words. He speaks of "outvoted minorities." Let us suppose the refractory country to be Great Britain, outvoted on some question relating to sea-power. Of whom will the outvoted minority consist? Of the British members on the "Common Council" of the Concert. But the question at once arises, what are the credentials of these British members? Whom do they represent? To whom are they responsible? If they are the representatives of the British people and responsible to the democracy which sent them, ho
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>  



Top keywords:

Common

 

Concert

 

accustom

 

question

 

Government

 

British

 

responsible

 
outvoted
 

Powers

 

minorities


Judiciary
 
individuals
 

Responsibility

 

members

 
elements
 

credentials

 
orders
 
higher
 

policy

 

conducting


representatives

 

people

 
democracy
 

represent

 

independent

 

jurisdiction

 
essence
 

speaks

 

minority

 
consist

Murray

 

surrendered

 

suppose

 

Britain

 

relating

 
country
 
refractory
 

Professor

 

Statehood

 

arises


Council

 

Executive

 

Legislature

 

attributes

 

middle

 

Tribunal

 
permanent
 

problems

 

quarrel

 
enforce