FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  
us _Reticularia_ certain specimens received from M. Roze of Paris. Thirteen years later in correspondence with M. Roze, Mr. Wingate satisfied himself that the specimens discovered by Roze were the same as our common enteridium. He therefore, _l. c._, applied to our American forms the name they have widely borne, _E. rozeanum_. Mr. Lister, _Jour. of Botany_, Sept. '91, applied the Rostafinskian name to certain English specimens. Thereafter to be known as _Reticularia lobata_ Rost. and so fixed the status of that species. From all the literature before us it appears that Mr. Lister was right. _R. lobata_ List. (now _Liceopsis lobata_ List.) Torr., occurs in various parts of Europe, while our American species of _Enteridium_ is yet to be discovered on that side of the sea! Were the latter native to the old world at all, it had surely been seen long ago. It is large and fine, and could not have escaped the famous collectors of the last two hundred years. Although it has been sent by students from this side of the ocean to Europe for more than thirty years, it has not even adventitiously appeared. It therefore appears that our American species is known to Europe through Mr. Wingate's reference only. Twenty years ago in correspondence with Mr. Wingate it was learned that the material received by him from M. Roze was but a small fragment, crushed flat, and even this was at that time no longer in evidence. This specimen was itself _not part of the gathering submitted to Rostafinski_; but only the fragment of something _appearing in 1890 in the same locality_! ... "something not the same, But only like its forecast in men's dreams." When we further reflect that the spores of species of several of the forms now in review, _Tubifera_, _Reticularia_, _Enteridium_, are not without difficulty distinguished, it is easy to see that Mr. Wingate's specific reference has narrow foundations to say the least. It seems now likely that Father Torrend's _Liceopsis_, _Reticulara lobata_ R., M. Roze's aftermath, and all, are but the depauperate forms of some tubifera! _E. rozeanum Wing._, is therefore the synonym for an ill-defined something in Western Europe and need not further here concern us as far material reference goes. In any case, what induced Mr. Wingate to pull Rostafinski's uncertain description of a problematic form across the sea, to attach it to our clearly defined and well known American species, changing
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Wingate

 

species

 
American
 

Europe

 

lobata

 

reference

 

specimens

 
Reticularia
 

Liceopsis

 

material


fragment

 

Rostafinski

 

Enteridium

 
appears
 
defined
 

rozeanum

 

applied

 
discovered
 

received

 

correspondence


Lister
 

locality

 
problematic
 

forecast

 

uncertain

 

reflect

 

dreams

 

description

 

specimen

 
evidence

changing

 

gathering

 

attach

 
spores
 

synonym

 
submitted
 
appearing
 

longer

 

Father

 
concern

aftermath

 
Torrend
 
Reticulara
 

foundations

 

Western

 

tubifera

 

induced

 
Tubifera
 
review
 

difficulty