FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  
who had distinctly broken the law were more or less comforted or protected by the Liberal party in the Swiss Federal Assembly. Compare Hilty, _Separatabdruck aus dem Politischen Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft_ (_Jahrgang_ 1891). [94] See p. 103, _ante_. [The force of this illustration has been increased by every Land Act passed since 1893. 'The Imperial Exchequer [_i.e._ in effect Great Britain] has made a free grant of L17,000,000 towards furthering land purchase; moreover to that end it has expressed its willingness to pledge its credit to the amount of L183,000,000 of which over L35,000,000 has already been raised. The Imperial Exchequer looks to the Irish tenant purchaser for the interest and sinking fund on that loan.'--Cambray, _Irish Affairs_, p. 214.] CHAPTER III WHY THE NEW CONSTITUTION WILL NOT BE A SETTLEMENT OF THE IRISH QUESTION '_We believe that this measure [the Home Rule Bill] when improved in Committee will be, at all events in our time, a final settlement of the Irish question_.'[95] 'Five speeches were made from the Irish benches ... there was not one of those speeches which fell short of what we have declared to be in our opinion necessary for the acceptance of this Bill. That is where we look for a durable and solid statement as to finality. We find the word _finality_ not even eschewed by the generous unreserve of the honourable member for North Longford[96] who attached the character of finality to the Bill.... What said the honourable member for Kerry[97] last night? He said, "_This is a Bill that will end the feud of ages_" This is exactly what we want to do. That is what I call acceptance by the Irish members of this Bill.... _What we mean by this Bill is to close and bury a controversy of seven hundred years.'_[98] This hope of ending the feud of ages has been for years dangled by Gladstonians before the English electorate. It has gained thousands of votes for Home Rule. But it is doomed to disappointment. The new constitution will never be a settlement of the Irish question: and this for three reasons, which can be definitely stated and easily understood. _First._ The new constitution satisfies neither Ireland nor England. It does not satisfy Ireland. Ulster, Protestant Ireland, and indeed, speaking generally, all men of property in Ireland, whether Protestant or Catholic, detest Home Rule. They hate the new constitution, they protest against the ne
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ireland

 

constitution

 

finality

 

Exchequer

 

Imperial

 

member

 

honourable

 
speeches
 

Protestant

 

settlement


question
 

acceptance

 

generous

 

unreserve

 
Longford
 
character
 

eschewed

 

attached

 

satisfy

 

opinion


declared

 

Ulster

 

durable

 

England

 
statement
 

protest

 

doomed

 
disappointment
 

satisfies

 

thousands


detest

 

English

 

electorate

 

gained

 

stated

 

easily

 

reasons

 

Catholic

 
property
 

Gladstonians


speaking

 

members

 

understood

 

ending

 

dangled

 

hundred

 

controversy

 

generally

 
Committee
 

passed