FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  
ckfriars Theatre, became an assistant to Pierce in the management of Paul's. In this capacity we find him in 1606 receiving the payment for the two performances of the Boys at Court that year.[173] [Footnote 173: Cunningham, _Extracts from the Accounts of the Revels_, p. XXXVIII.] Among the playwrights engaged by Pierce to write for Paul's were Marston, Middleton, Chapman, Dekker, Webster, and Beaumont; and, as a result, some of the most interesting dramas of the period were first acted on the small stage of the singing-school. Details in the history of the Children, however, are few. We find an occasional notice of their appearance at Court, but our record of them is mainly secured from the title-pages of their plays. The last notice of a performance by them is as follows: "On the 30th of July, 1606, the youths of Paul's, commonly called the Children of Paul's, played before the two Kings [of England and of Denmark] a play called _Abuses_, containing both a comedy and a tragedy, at which the Kings seemed to take great delight and be much pleased."[174] [Footnote 174: Nichols, _The Progresses of James_, IV, 1073.] The reason why the Children ceased to act is made clear in the lawsuit of Keysar _v._ Burbage _et al._, recently discovered and printed by Mr. Wallace.[175] From this we learn that when Rosseter became manager of the Children of the Queen's Revels at the private playhouse of Whitefriars in 1609, he undertook to increase his profits by securing a monopoly both of child-acting and of private theatres. Blackfriars had been deserted, and the only other private theatre then in existence was Paul's. So Rosseter agreed to pay Pierce a dead rent of L20 a year to keep the Paul's playhouse closed: One Mr. Rosseter, a partner of the said complainant, dealt for and compounded with the said Mr. Pierce to the only benefit of him, the said Mr. Rosseter, the now complainant, the rest of their partners and Company [at the Whitefriars] ... that thereby they might ... advance their gains and profit to be had and made in their said house in the Whitefriars, that there might be a cessation of playing and plays to be acted in the said house near St. Paul's Church aforesaid, for which the said Rosseter compounded with the said Pierce to give him the said Pierce twenty pounds per annum.[176] [Footnote 175: _Shakespeare and his London Associates_, p. 80.] [Footno
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Pierce

 

Rosseter

 

Children

 

Whitefriars

 

private

 

Footnote

 
notice
 

playhouse

 

compounded

 

complainant


called
 

Revels

 

existence

 

Blackfriars

 

acting

 

theatres

 

deserted

 

theatre

 
profits
 

payment


Wallace

 
recently
 

discovered

 

printed

 

receiving

 
manager
 

capacity

 
agreed
 

securing

 

increase


undertook

 

monopoly

 

Church

 

aforesaid

 

playing

 

ckfriars

 

cessation

 
twenty
 

pounds

 

Associates


Footno
 
London
 

Shakespeare

 
profit
 
partner
 
management
 

assistant

 

closed

 

benefit

 

Theatre