FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  
ckfriars Theatre, became an assistant to Pierce in the management of Paul's. In this capacity we find him in 1606 receiving the payment for the two performances of the Boys at Court that year.[173] [Footnote 173: Cunningham, _Extracts from the Accounts of the Revels_, p. XXXVIII.] Among the playwrights engaged by Pierce to write for Paul's were Marston, Middleton, Chapman, Dekker, Webster, and Beaumont; and, as a result, some of the most interesting dramas of the period were first acted on the small stage of the singing-school. Details in the history of the Children, however, are few. We find an occasional notice of their appearance at Court, but our record of them is mainly secured from the title-pages of their plays. The last notice of a performance by them is as follows: "On the 30th of July, 1606, the youths of Paul's, commonly called the Children of Paul's, played before the two Kings [of England and of Denmark] a play called _Abuses_, containing both a comedy and a tragedy, at which the Kings seemed to take great delight and be much pleased."[174] [Footnote 174: Nichols, _The Progresses of James_, IV, 1073.] The reason why the Children ceased to act is made clear in the lawsuit of Keysar _v._ Burbage _et al._, recently discovered and printed by Mr. Wallace.[175] From this we learn that when Rosseter became manager of the Children of the Queen's Revels at the private playhouse of Whitefriars in 1609, he undertook to increase his profits by securing a monopoly both of child-acting and of private theatres. Blackfriars had been deserted, and the only other private theatre then in existence was Paul's. So Rosseter agreed to pay Pierce a dead rent of L20 a year to keep the Paul's playhouse closed: One Mr. Rosseter, a partner of the said complainant, dealt for and compounded with the said Mr. Pierce to the only benefit of him, the said Mr. Rosseter, the now complainant, the rest of their partners and Company [at the Whitefriars] ... that thereby they might ... advance their gains and profit to be had and made in their said house in the Whitefriars, that there might be a cessation of playing and plays to be acted in the said house near St. Paul's Church aforesaid, for which the said Rosseter compounded with the said Pierce to give him the said Pierce twenty pounds per annum.[176] [Footnote 175: _Shakespeare and his London Associates_, p. 80.] [Footno
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Pierce

 

Rosseter

 
Children
 

Whitefriars

 

private

 

Footnote

 

notice

 

playhouse

 

compounded

 
complainant

called

 
Revels
 
existence
 
Blackfriars
 
acting
 

theatres

 

deserted

 

theatre

 

profits

 

payment


Wallace

 

recently

 

discovered

 

printed

 

receiving

 

manager

 

capacity

 

agreed

 
securing
 

increase


undertook

 

monopoly

 

Church

 

aforesaid

 
playing
 
ckfriars
 

cessation

 
twenty
 
pounds
 

Associates


Footno
 
London
 

Shakespeare

 

profit

 

partner

 

management

 

assistant

 

closed

 

benefit

 

Theatre