FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   >>   >|  
y fraudulent brewers, when compared with the methods employed by them for rendering beer noxious to health by substances absolutely injurious. To increase the intoxicating quality of beer, the deleterious vegetable substance, called _cocculus indicus_, and the extract of this poisonous berry, technically called _black extract_, or, by some, _hard multum_, are employed. Opium, tobacco, nux vomica, and extract of poppies, have also been used. This fraud constitutes by far the most censurable offence committed by unprincipled brewers; and it is a lamentable reflection to behold so great a number of brewers prosecuted and convicted of this crime; nor is it less deplorable to find the names of druggists, eminent in trade, implicated in the fraud, by selling the unlawful ingredients to brewers for fraudulent purposes. _List of Brewers prosecuted and convicted from 1813 to 1819, for receiving and using illegal Ingredients in their Brewings._[70] Richard Gardner, brewer, for using adulterating ingredients, 100_l._, judgment by default. Stephen Webb and another, brewers, for using adulterating ingredients, and mixing strong and table beer, verdict 500_l._ Henry Wyatt, brewer, for using adulterating ingredients, verdict 400_l._ John Harbart, retailer, for receiving adulterating ingredients, verdict 150_l._ Philip Blake and others, brewers, for using adulterating ingredients, and mixing strong and table beer, verdict 250_l._ James Sneed, for receiving adulterating ingredients, 25_l._ and costs. John Rewell and another, brewers, ditto, verdict 100_l._ John Swain and another, ditto, for using adulterating ingredients, verdict 200_l._ John Ing, brewer, ditto, stayed on defendant's death. John Hall, ditto, for receiving adulterating ingredients, 5_l._ and costs. John Webb, retailer, for using adulterating ingredients. Ralph Fogg and another, brewers, for receiving and using adulterating ingredients. John Gray, brewer, for using adulterating ingredients, 300_l._ and costs. Richard Bowman, for using liquid in bladder, supposed to be extract of cocculus, 100_l._ Richard Bowman, brewer, for ditto, 100_l._ and costs. Septimus Stephens, brewer, for ditto, verdict 50_l._ James Rogers and another, brewer, for ditto, 220_l._ and costs. George Moore, brewer, for using colouring, 300_l._ and costs. John Morris, for using adulterating ingredients. Webb and Ball, for using ginger, Guinea peppe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

ingredients

 

adulterating

 

brewers

 
brewer
 

verdict

 

receiving

 

extract

 

Richard

 
retailer
 

convicted


strong

 
fraudulent
 

mixing

 
prosecuted
 

Bowman

 

cocculus

 

employed

 
called
 

Philip

 

Gardner


rendering

 
methods
 

judgment

 

default

 

compared

 

Stephen

 
Harbart
 

Rewell

 
Rogers
 

Stephens


Septimus

 

supposed

 

George

 

Guinea

 
ginger
 
colouring
 
Morris
 

bladder

 

liquid

 

stayed


Brewings

 

defendant

 
vomica
 

poppies

 

tobacco

 

multum

 
constitutes
 

deleterious

 

vegetable

 

substance