FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   >>  
the court to mitigate the penalty. He was convicted in the penalty of 50_l._ _The King against Thomas Owen._--The defendant, an extensive dealer in tea and coffee, appeared to an information charging him with having in his possession, and selling, a quantity of deleterious ingredients, and mixing them with coffee. Charles Henry Lord deposed, that on the 26th of February, he found, at the shop of the defendant, nineteen pounds of a composition consisting of beans and pease ground, and prepared so as to imitate coffee. He also discovered two pounds and a half of a mixture of coffee and vegetable powder. On the same day he proceeded to another shop of the defendant, and he there found five pounds more of the same stuff. Samples of the composition, in its mixed and unmixed state, were produced. Mr. Lawes addressed the commissioners on behalf of the defendant, in mitigation of punishment; for he did not mean to deny the offence. His client was a very young man, and had been most unfortunate in business. He was not aware until lately of the existence of any law by which it could be punished. The Commissioners observed, that they had a double duty to perform, namely, to protect the revenue from fraud, and to prevent the public from being imposed upon and injured by ingredients served to them instead of the food they intended to purchase. The fraud upon the revenue was, in the estimation of the court, the least part of the offence. Under all the circumstances, however, the court was inclined to be lenient to the defendant. He was convicted in the penalty of 50_l._ for each quantity of sham-coffee. Mr. Greely and Mr. William Dando were fined 20_l._ each; and Mr. Hirling and Mr. Terry were fined 90_l._ each for selling spurious coffee. The adulteration of ground coffee, with pease and beans, is beyond the reach of chemical analysis; but it may, perhaps, not be amiss on this occasion to give to our readers a piece of advice given by a retired grocer to a friend, at no distant period:--"Never, my good fellow," he said, "purchase from a grocer any thing which passes through his mill. You know not what you get instead of the article you expect to receive--coffee, pepper, and all-spice, are all mixed with substances which detract from their own natural qualities."--Persons keeping mills of their own can at all times prevent these impositions. _Adulteration of Brandy, Rum, and Gin._ By the Excise laws at
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   >>  



Top keywords:
coffee
 

defendant

 

pounds

 
penalty
 

composition

 
grocer
 

offence

 

ground

 

selling

 

purchase


revenue

 
prevent
 

quantity

 

ingredients

 

convicted

 

analysis

 

chemical

 

estimation

 

Hirling

 
William

circumstances

 

inclined

 
lenient
 

Greely

 

spurious

 

adulteration

 

occasion

 
natural
 

detract

 
qualities

Persons

 

keeping

 

substances

 

expect

 
receive
 

pepper

 

Excise

 
Brandy
 

impositions

 

Adulteration


article

 
friend
 

distant

 

period

 

retired

 

readers

 

advice

 

passes

 

fellow

 

intended