nd site. Waterman on p. 206
gives 6 houses for _turip_ but in view of
the second probable village I recommend
increasing this to 8 and thus agree with
Waterman's informants. Kroeber does not
mention this matter.

20. stowen P P. 207. This is a "well known place" with
Indians living there now, although they
are not the descendants of the ancient
population. However Waterman also says, on
p. 235, that "the site is well known and
may have been a settlement in former
times." Furthermore, it is on the survey
map Randall made in 1866. This map appears
to have been accurately drawn and creates
a strong presumption that the village was
in existence in early times. It is
reasonable to assign 3 houses to the site.

21. rliiken-pets C See no. 23.

22. howego P See no. 23.

23. tawchter P There is some confusion about these three
places. Kroeber shows (map, p. 9)
_rliiken-pets_ as a place occupied
intermittently, but does not mention
_howego_ or _tawchter_. The first
(_rliiken-pets_) is stated by Waterman to
have been the "site of a small settlement"
where informants recalled 2 houses and a
sweathouse. In the summer the people went
to _howego_ to camp and fish. On p. 237
_howego_ is described as a "flat" with no
houses mentioned, but on p. 207 Waterman
says: "_howego_ ... is a well known place
... but was not described to me as a town.
Apparently there is an old town site there
... whose existence I did not hear of when
on the spot." Further evidence lies in the