FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332  
333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   >>  
tory, which becomes, apparently, not only more tedious, but less credible by repetition, I feel that I am doing nothing good, possibly even some evil. Now, sir, you have shown by your questions in the House, not only that you remember Mataafa, but that you are instructed in his case, and this exposes you to the trouble of reading this letter. Mataafa was made the prisoner of the three Powers. He had been guilty of rebellion; but surely rather formally than really. He was the appointed King of Samoa. The treaty set him aside, and he obeyed the three Powers. His successor--or I should rather say his successor's advisers and surroundings--fell out with him. He was disgusted by the spectacle of their misgovernment. In this humour he fell to the study of the Berlin Act, and was misled by the famous passage, "His successor shall be duly elected according to the laws and customs of Samoa." It is to be noted that what I will venture to call the infamous Protocol--a measure equally of German vanity, English cowardice, and American _incuria_--had not been and _has never yet been_ translated into the Samoan language. They feared light because their works were darkness. For what he did during what I can only call his candidature, I must refer you to the last chapter of my book. It was rebellion to the three Powers; to him it was not rebellion. The troops of the King attacked him first. The sudden arrival and sudden action of Captain Bickford concluded the affair in the very beginning. Mataafa surrendered. He surrendered to Captain Bickford. He was brought back to Apia on Captain Bickford's ship. I shall never forget the Captain pointing to the British ensign and saying, "Tell them they are safe under that." And the next thing we learned, Mataafa and his chiefs were transferred to a German war-ship and carried to the Marshalls. Who was responsible for this? Who is responsible now for the care and good treatment of these political prisoners? I am far from hinting that the Germans actually maltreat him. I know even that many of the Germans regard him with respect. But I can only speak of what I know here. It is impossible to send him or any of his chiefs either a present or a letter. I believe the mission (Catholic) has been allowed some form of communication. On the same occasion I sent down letters and presents. They were refused; and the officer of the deck on the German war-ship had so little reticence as to pass the remark,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332  
333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   >>  



Top keywords:

Mataafa

 

Captain

 
Powers
 

Bickford

 

rebellion

 
successor
 

German

 

responsible

 

chiefs

 

Germans


letter

 

surrendered

 
sudden
 

action

 
concluded
 
arrival
 
troops
 

carried

 

transferred

 

attacked


learned

 

pointing

 
British
 

ensign

 

Marshalls

 

brought

 
forget
 

affair

 

beginning

 

occasion


communication

 

mission

 

Catholic

 

allowed

 

letters

 

presents

 

reticence

 
remark
 

refused

 

officer


present

 

hinting

 
prisoners
 
political
 

treatment

 

maltreat

 

impossible

 
regard
 

respect

 

apparently