FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230  
231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>   >|  
es 2 1 1 1 Stephen 1 4 3 9 Thomas 4 2 2 4 William 6 7 1 1 n = 7 sum of D[squared] = 24 n[squared] - 1 = 48 6 x sum of D[squared] = 144 6 x sum of D[squared] / n ( n[squared] - 1 ) = 1 - 144/(7 x 48) = +.57 In order to get a full and true measure of the correlation between two tests, the following precautions are necessary: (1) The _same individuals_ must be given both tests. (2) The number of individuals tested must be as great as 15 or 20, preferably more. (3) The individuals should be a fair sample of the population in regard to the abilities tested; they should not be so selected as to represent only a small part of the total range of ability. (4) The tests should be thorough enough to determine each individual's rank in each test, with a high degree of certainty. Sloppy testing gives a correlation nearer zero than it should be, because it "pies" the true orders to some extent. [End footnote] {285} General Factors in Intelligence If now we try to analyze intelligence and see in what it consists, we can best proceed by reviewing the intelligence tests, and asking how it is that an individual succeeds in them. Passing the tests is a very specific instance of {286} intelligent behavior, and an analysis of the content of the tests should throw some light on the nature of intelligence. The first thing that strikes the eye in looking over the tests is that they call for so many different reactions. They call on you to name objects, to copy a square, to tell whether a given statement is true or false, to tell wherein two objects are alike or different. The first impression, then, is that intelligence consists simply in doing a miscellaneous lot of things and doing them right. But can we not state in more general terms how the individual who scores high in the tests differs from one who scores low? If you survey the test questions carefully, you begin to see that the person who passes them must possess certain general characteristics, and that lack of these characteristics will lead to a low score. We may speak of these characteristics as "general factors" in intelligent behavior. First, the tests evidently require the use of past experience. They call, not for inst
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230  
231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

squared

 

intelligence

 

general

 

individuals

 

characteristics

 
individual
 

scores

 

behavior

 
intelligent
 

objects


consists
 
correlation
 

tested

 

reactions

 
content
 

analysis

 

experience

 

require

 

factors

 
nature

evidently

 

strikes

 
things
 

miscellaneous

 

carefully

 

survey

 
differs
 

questions

 
person
 
passes

statement

 

square

 
simply
 

possess

 

impression

 

General

 

sample

 

population

 

regard

 
preferably

abilities

 

selected

 

ability

 

represent

 

number

 
William
 

Thomas

 

Stephen

 

precautions

 
measure