FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
al nature". C. B. Davenport, in his _Heredity and Eugenics_, presents evidence of the importance of heredity in determining mental and moral traits. Yerkes and Bloomfleld, in a short article in the _Psychological Bulletin_ for 1910, Vol. 7, pp. 253-263, under the title, "_Do Kittens Instinctively Kill Mice?_", furnish a good illustration of the method employed in distinguishing native from acquired reactions. {105} CHAPTER VI INSTINCT CONDUCT AS DETERMINED BY NATIVE REACTION-TENDENCIES Instinct is native behavior. It is contrasted with habit, knowledge, or anything in the way of learned reactions. When the mother wasp gathers a store of food suitable for young wasps, lays eggs beside the food and covers the whole with a wall of mud, we know that her behavior is instinctive because she has had no possible chance to learn from older wasps. She has never seen a wasp's nest made, for when the last preceding crop of nests was being made she was herself an unhatched egg. Therefore, she cannot possibly know the use of the nest with its eggs and store of food. She has no "reason" for building the nest, no ulterior purpose, but is impelled to build the nest, simply and solely for the sake of doing just that thing. Thus instinct is contrasted with calculated or reasoned action as well as with learned action. Calculated action is based on knowledge of cause and effect, and this knowledge is acquired by the individual in the course of his experience; but instinct is not based on the individual's experience, but only on his native constitution. The case of the baby eating is exactly the same as that of the wasp. The baby has not learned to eat, he knows nothing of the use of food and therefore has no ulterior purpose in eating, he does not reason about the matter, but eats simply because hunger is a native impulse to eat. {106} Eating is an end in itself to a hungry baby, and not a means to some further end; and that is what eating continues to be even to the hungry adult, however much he may learn about the use of food in maintaining life. From a broad philosophical point of view, instinct may be seen to work towards some great end, such as the preservation of the individual or the propagation of the race, but from the individual's own point of view, it is directed simply towards the performance of some particular act, or the accomplishment of some particular result. If instinct, as a collective term, means
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

individual

 
native
 
instinct
 

knowledge

 
learned
 
simply
 
eating
 

action

 

experience

 

contrasted


reason
 

purpose

 

ulterior

 

hungry

 
behavior
 
acquired
 

reactions

 

determining

 

mental

 
heredity

hunger
 

impulse

 

matter

 

importance

 
Eating
 

traits

 

Psychological

 
effect
 

Bulletin

 
Calculated

constitution
 

Yerkes

 

Bloomfleld

 

article

 

presents

 
propagation
 

preservation

 

nature

 

directed

 
performance

collective

 

result

 

accomplishment

 

Heredity

 
continues
 

reasoned

 

Eugenics

 
philosophical
 

Davenport

 

maintaining