FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   >>  
ol. Some people imagine themselves "fleeced," when the real trouble was their own get-rich-quick greed in buying highly speculative or unsound securities, or having gone into the market beyond their depth, or having exercised poor judgment as to the time of buying and selling. Against these causes I know of no effective remedy, just as there is no way to prevent a man from overeating or eating what is bad for him. In saying this, I do not mean to imply that stockbrokers have not a duty in the premises. [Sidenote: _Does the public get fleeced?_] On the contrary, they have a very distinct and comprehensive duty towards their clients, especially those less familiar with stock market and financial affairs, and towards the public at large. And they have furthermore the duty to abstain from tempting or unduly encouraging people to speculate on margin, especially people of limited means, and from accepting or continuing accounts which are not amply protected by margin. In respect of the latter requirement, the Stock Exchange has rightly increased the stringency of its rules some years ago, and it cannot too sternly set its face against an infringement of those rules or too vigilantly guard against their evasion. Against unscrupulous promotion and financiering a remedy might be found in a law which should forbid any public dealing in any industrial security [for railroad and public service securities the existing Commissions afford ample protection to the public] unless its introduction is accompanied by a prospectus setting forth every material detail about the company concerned and the security offered, such prospectus to be signed by persons who are to be held responsible at law for any wilful omission or misstatement therein. [Sidenote: _Does the public get fleeced?_] Such a law would be analogous in its purpose and function to the Pure Food Law, Any, let us call it, "anti-fleecing" law which went beyond that purpose and function would overshoot the mark. The Pure Food Law does not pretend to prescribe how much a man should eat, when he should eat or what is good or bad for him to eat, but it does prescribe that the ingredients of what is sold to him as food must be honestly and publicly stated. The same principle should prevail in respect of the offering and sale of securities. If a drug contains water, the quantity or proportion must be shown on the label, so that a man cannot sell you a bottle filled with
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   >>  



Top keywords:
public
 

fleeced

 

securities

 

people

 

Sidenote

 

function

 
prospectus
 

security

 

respect

 

margin


purpose

 

market

 

buying

 

prescribe

 
remedy
 

Against

 

setting

 

honestly

 

accompanied

 

material


company
 

concerned

 

offered

 
offering
 
prevail
 

detail

 

protection

 

industrial

 

railroad

 

dealing


principle

 

filled

 

bottle

 

forbid

 

service

 

existing

 

publicly

 
stated
 

Commissions

 

afford


introduction

 

fleecing

 
pretend
 
overshoot
 

proportion

 

responsible

 
wilful
 

omission

 
persons
 

quantity