FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213  
>>  
(see p. 45, n. 1). And he goes further when he asserts that none were allowed to be bishops who were not of their family (Sec. 19); thus leaving the impression that under the rule of the eight lay abbots--that is, for a century and a half--Armagh was deprived of episcopal ministrations. But this is wholly unhistorical. The Ulster Annals mention six bishops of Armagh, contemporary with the lay abbots. They seem to have followed one another in regular succession, and there is no indication that any one of them belonged to the Clann Sinaich. They were no doubt monastic bishops, such as are found in the Irish Church from the sixth century onwards, who exercised the functions of their order at the bidding of the abbots. They were probably not referred to in St. Bernard's document; and if they were, one who had been trained in an entirely different ecclesiastical system would have been at a loss to understand their position. Thus we conclude that St. Bernard, in the passage which we are considering, used good material with conscientious care, but that he was misled by lack of knowledge of Irish ecclesiastical methods. This result is important because it may apparently be applied to the whole of his memoir of St. Malachy. His statements, as a rule, stand well the test of comparison with the native records; and when he is at fault we can usually explain his errors as misunderstandings, due to ignorance of conditions of which he had no experience. St. Bernard has been charged with gross exaggeration in another passage. "A great miracle to-day," he writes (Sec. 30), "is the extinction of that generation, so quickly wrought, especially for those who knew their pride and power." It is an extravagant hyperbole to say that either the O'Neills, or the great tribe of the Oirgialla, represented to this day by the Maguires, the O'Hanlons and the MacMahons, was blotted out when the _Life of St. Malachy_ was written. So argued some in the time of Colgan (_Trias_, p. 302). But they misrepresented St. Bernard. The word "generation" obviously means in the sentence before us what it meant in Sec. 19 ("adulterous generation")--not an extensive tribe, nor even the Clann Sinaich as a whole, but the branch of that sept which provided abbots for Armagh. The speedy extinction of a single family is not a thing incredible. And it is worthy of remark that neither the Clann Sinaich, nor any person described as ua Sinaich or mac Sinaich is mentioned
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213  
>>  



Top keywords:

Sinaich

 

Bernard

 
abbots
 
Armagh
 

generation

 

bishops

 

ecclesiastical

 

passage

 

extinction

 

Malachy


century
 

family

 

wrought

 

Oirgialla

 
represented
 
Neills
 

hyperbole

 

quickly

 

extravagant

 

ignorance


conditions

 

experience

 

misunderstandings

 

explain

 

errors

 

charged

 

writes

 

impression

 

Maguires

 

miracle


exaggeration

 
leaving
 

MacMahons

 

provided

 

speedy

 

single

 

branch

 

adulterous

 

extensive

 

incredible


mentioned

 

person

 

worthy

 

remark

 

argued

 

written

 

blotted

 
Colgan
 

sentence

 

misrepresented