FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126  
127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   >>   >|  
. 13. [500] Cp. Sec. 44, p. 83. [501] It has been commonly assumed that the house of this convent--which obviously consisted of Augustinian canons (the only order of regular clerics recognized at this period by the Roman Church: see Conc. Lat. 1139, can. 9, Mansi xxi. 528)--was in Downpatrick. It has accordingly been identified with a monastery which in the Terrier of 1615 is described as "the monastery of the Irish, hard by the Cathedral," and called "the church of the channons" (Reeves, 43, 231). But it is not stated in the text to have been in Down. It seems more likely to have been the monastery of Bangor, which was destroyed in 1127 (Sec. 18), and must have been reconstituted about this time. There is no indication in the _Life_ that Malachy resided in Down, while there are several hints that Bangor was his headquarters and that he was abbot of the community there as long as he lived. (See p. 33, n. 1.) In other words Bangor was, in fact if not in name, the see of the diocese of Ulaid, or Down. For this curious anomaly we have a parallel in the diocese of Tir Eoghain, the see of which for a long period was at Maghera, the bishop, the while, being often styled bishop of Derry (_Irish Church Quarterly_, x. 225 ff.); and for the bishop of a diocese serving as abbot of his cathedral chapter of regular canons we may point to Carlisle (_Trans. of Scottish Ecclesiological Society_, iii. 267 ff.), Louth (_L.A.J._ iv. 143 ff.) and Christ Church, Dublin (_ibid._ 145). That the canons of Bangor were at an early period the bishop's chapter we have independent evidence. For in 1244 the Pope gave judgement in a cause which had been pending for some time between the prior and monks of Down and the abbot and canons of Bangor, each of whom claimed that their church was cathedral (Theiner, p. 42). This claim on behalf of Bangor is easily explained if it was reckoned as the bishop's see in the time of Malachy. [502] 2 Cor. x. 4. [503] Luke viii. 5. [504] Matt. xxi. 23; Mark xi. 28. [505] Acts viii. 6; John ii. 23. [506] 2 Cor. iii. 17. CHAPTER V _The Roman Pilgrimage: the Miracles which were wrought in it._ [Sidenote: 1139] 33. (20). It seemed to him, however, that one could not go on doing these things with sufficient security without the authority of the Apostolic See; and for that reason he determined to set out for Rome, and most of all because the metropolitan see still lacked, and from the be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126  
127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Bangor

 

bishop

 

canons

 
Church
 

monastery

 
period
 

diocese

 

church

 

regular

 
chapter

cathedral

 

Malachy

 

easily

 

Theiner

 

behalf

 

explained

 

pending

 
independent
 
evidence
 
Christ

Dublin

 

judgement

 
claimed
 

metropolitan

 

Sidenote

 

Apostolic

 

reason

 
determined
 

authority

 

things


sufficient

 

security

 

wrought

 

Miracles

 

lacked

 

CHAPTER

 

Pilgrimage

 
reckoned
 

parallel

 
Cathedral

called

 

channons

 

Downpatrick

 

identified

 

Terrier

 

Reeves

 

destroyed

 

stated

 

commonly

 

assumed