FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  
father was apparently the poet of a Tyrone sept, named Dermot (O'Hanlon, _Saints_, iii. 965). About 1121 he was appointed abbot of Derry, and held that office till he became archbishop of Armagh in 1137. He had a long episcopate and seems to have been a vigorous prelate. His age and infirmity (says Giraldus) prevented him from attending the Synod of Cashel in 1172. But he subsequently visited Henry II. in Dublin. Thither he brought the white cow, whose milk was his only food (Giraldus, _Expug._ i. 35). He died March 27, 1174, in his eighty-seventh year. For a Life of Gelasius, see Colgan, _A.S.H._ p. 772. [493] See Sec. 21. [494] _I.e._ diocese. [495] The two episcopal sees are evidently Connor and Down. But in early time there were many more sees than two in that district (see Reeves, p. 138), and there is no evidence that any one of them was the seat of a diocesan bishop. But, even if it were so, St. Bernard's statement that the two supposed dioceses were "welded into one" by some ambitious prelate prior to Malachy is unhistorical. A bishop of Connor and a bishop of Down both died in 1117, just seven years before Malachy became bishop of the diocese which included these two places; and there is no trace of a bishop in either of them in the interval. The fact seems to be that the diocese of Connor or Down was constituted for the first time at the Synod of Rathbreasail in 1110. It remained on paper until Malachy was appointed its first bishop. For the probable reason of Malachy's division of the diocese, see p. lvii. f. [496] This cannot be the true reason for Malachy's choice of Down rather than Connor. If he had wished to go to Connor on his retirement from Armagh he could have consecrated a bishop for Down. It is more probable that his preference was due to his love for Bangor, where he resided during his first episcopate, and where he probably resided also when he was bishop of Down. But, however that may be, Bangor was necessarily under his jurisdiction as bishop of Down; his connexion with it would have been severed if he had assumed the oversight of the new diocese of Connor. [497] Isa. li. 9; Amos ix. 11. [498] Cp. Cant. i. 15; iv. i.; v. 12.--St. Bernard himself is said to have had "dove-like eyes" (_V.P._ v. 12); and the meaning of the phrase is explained thus: "In his eyes there shone a certain angelic _purity_ and a dove-like _simplicity_ (single-mindedness)" (_ibid._ iii. 1). [499] Amos i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
bishop
 

Connor

 

Malachy

 
diocese
 

reason

 

probable

 

Bangor

 

resided

 
Armagh
 
episcopate

appointed

 

Giraldus

 

prelate

 

Bernard

 

constituted

 

interval

 

places

 

choice

 

Rathbreasail

 
division

remained
 

wished

 
necessarily
 

meaning

 

phrase

 

explained

 

mindedness

 
single
 
simplicity
 

purity


angelic
 

retirement

 

consecrated

 

preference

 

included

 

oversight

 

assumed

 

severed

 

jurisdiction

 

connexion


subsequently

 

visited

 

Cashel

 
attending
 

infirmity

 

prevented

 

Dublin

 

Thither

 

brought

 

Dermot