FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  
ied in 1211 (_A.L.C._), we need not hesitate to conclude that the "impudent bishop" was Rochfort himself, and that the suppression was accomplished about 1213. [33] _I.e._ dioceses. This synod is mentioned in _A.T._, _A.I._ and the _Annals of Boyle_. Particulars of its Acts and of the persons present at it are given in _C.S._ and _D.A.I._ _C.S._ has "parish" in the singular. But this does not seem to yield good sense; for the whole extent of the kingdom of Meath could scarcely have been called a "parish" in the twelfth century. I therefore read "parishes." The singular may have been substituted for the plural at a later time, when the kingdom (or the greater part of it) included only the dioceses of Meath and Clonmacnoise, and their earlier history was forgotten. Cp. the unhistorical statement of St. Bernard about Down and Connor in _Life_, Sec. 31. _D.A.I._ have an anomalous form (_faircheadh_), which may have come from either the singular (_fairche_) or the plural (_faircheadha_) in the exemplar, but more probably from the latter. [34] p. xxiv. f. [35] See p. 47, note 3. [36] Ussher, 513. [37] A small portion of the present diocese of Limerick lies north of the Shannon. [38] Ussher, 501 ff.; _P.L._ clix. 995. [39] See p. 65, note 1. [40] See Additional Note B, pp. 164, 166. The events of Cellach's life are gathered from _A. U._ [41] _Life_, Sec. 19. [42] See MacCarthy's Note in _A. U._ 1101. [43] _A.F.M._, Keating, iii. 297. Keating seems to confuse the events of 1101 with those of 1106. [44] _Life_, Sec. 33. [45] See p. 18, note 6. [46] See next page. [47] Keating, iii. 299 ff. The date is there misprinted 1100. [48] I formerly disputed this identification, on the ground that the archbishop of Cashel who was present at Fiadh meic Oengusa was O'Dunan (G. T. Stokes, _Ireland and the Celtic Church_, ed. 6, 1907, p. 372). I am now convinced that he was archbishop of Cashel. I was not then aware that all MSS. of Keating date the Synod of Rathbreasail in 1110. [49] On p. 298 read _no_ (_or_) for _is_ (_and_) before _Dun da Leathghlas_; and on p. 306 _chathar_ for _chuigear ar fhichid_ (i.e. _twenty-four_ for _twenty-five_). On p. 306 a portion of the note on the Leinster diocese has evidently dropped out, which should be restored to bring it into conformity with the corresponding passage on p. 302. [50] _H.E._ i. 29. [51] _I.e._ diocese. [52] The parish (using the word in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Keating

 

present

 
diocese
 

singular

 

parish

 

portion

 

twenty

 

kingdom

 

Ussher

 

archbishop


plural
 

events

 

Cashel

 

dioceses

 

misprinted

 

ground

 

Oengusa

 

disputed

 

identification

 

confuse


MacCarthy

 

dropped

 

restored

 

evidently

 

Leinster

 

chuigear

 

fhichid

 

conformity

 

passage

 
chathar

Leathghlas

 
convinced
 

Stokes

 

Ireland

 

Celtic

 

Church

 

gathered

 

Rathbreasail

 

scarcely

 

called


twelfth

 

century

 

extent

 

parishes

 

included

 

Clonmacnoise

 

earlier

 
greater
 

substituted

 

bishop