FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  
ied in 1211 (_A.L.C._), we need not hesitate to conclude that the "impudent bishop" was Rochfort himself, and that the suppression was accomplished about 1213. [33] _I.e._ dioceses. This synod is mentioned in _A.T._, _A.I._ and the _Annals of Boyle_. Particulars of its Acts and of the persons present at it are given in _C.S._ and _D.A.I._ _C.S._ has "parish" in the singular. But this does not seem to yield good sense; for the whole extent of the kingdom of Meath could scarcely have been called a "parish" in the twelfth century. I therefore read "parishes." The singular may have been substituted for the plural at a later time, when the kingdom (or the greater part of it) included only the dioceses of Meath and Clonmacnoise, and their earlier history was forgotten. Cp. the unhistorical statement of St. Bernard about Down and Connor in _Life_, Sec. 31. _D.A.I._ have an anomalous form (_faircheadh_), which may have come from either the singular (_fairche_) or the plural (_faircheadha_) in the exemplar, but more probably from the latter. [34] p. xxiv. f. [35] See p. 47, note 3. [36] Ussher, 513. [37] A small portion of the present diocese of Limerick lies north of the Shannon. [38] Ussher, 501 ff.; _P.L._ clix. 995. [39] See p. 65, note 1. [40] See Additional Note B, pp. 164, 166. The events of Cellach's life are gathered from _A. U._ [41] _Life_, Sec. 19. [42] See MacCarthy's Note in _A. U._ 1101. [43] _A.F.M._, Keating, iii. 297. Keating seems to confuse the events of 1101 with those of 1106. [44] _Life_, Sec. 33. [45] See p. 18, note 6. [46] See next page. [47] Keating, iii. 299 ff. The date is there misprinted 1100. [48] I formerly disputed this identification, on the ground that the archbishop of Cashel who was present at Fiadh meic Oengusa was O'Dunan (G. T. Stokes, _Ireland and the Celtic Church_, ed. 6, 1907, p. 372). I am now convinced that he was archbishop of Cashel. I was not then aware that all MSS. of Keating date the Synod of Rathbreasail in 1110. [49] On p. 298 read _no_ (_or_) for _is_ (_and_) before _Dun da Leathghlas_; and on p. 306 _chathar_ for _chuigear ar fhichid_ (i.e. _twenty-four_ for _twenty-five_). On p. 306 a portion of the note on the Leinster diocese has evidently dropped out, which should be restored to bring it into conformity with the corresponding passage on p. 302. [50] _H.E._ i. 29. [51] _I.e._ diocese. [52] The parish (using the word in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Keating

 
present
 

diocese

 
singular
 

parish

 

portion

 
twenty
 

kingdom

 

Ussher

 

archbishop


plural

 
events
 

Cashel

 

dioceses

 

misprinted

 

ground

 

Oengusa

 
disputed
 

identification

 

confuse


MacCarthy

 

dropped

 

restored

 

evidently

 

Leinster

 
chuigear
 
fhichid
 

conformity

 
passage
 

chathar


Leathghlas
 

convinced

 

Stokes

 

Ireland

 
Celtic
 

Church

 

gathered

 

Rathbreasail

 
scarcely
 

called


twelfth

 
century
 

extent

 

parishes

 

included

 
Clonmacnoise
 

earlier

 
greater
 

substituted

 

bishop