FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  
TEMPERATURES. _To the Editor of the Scientific American:_ Your issues of October 23 and 30 contain some remarkable articles under the heading of "Ice at High Temperatures." Prof. Carnelley says; "In order to convert a solid into a liquid, the _pressure_ must be above a certain point, otherwise no amount of heat will melt the substance," as it passes at once from the sold state into the state of gas, subliming away without previous melting. And, "having come to this conclusion, it was easily foreseen that it would be possible to have solid ice at temperatures far above the ordinary melting point." The first conclusion of the professor is correct, but not new. The second conclusion is new, but very doubtful as to its correctness, and certainly does not follow as a sequence from his premise. If we try to heat ice in a vacuum, we cannot apply any heat to the ice direct, but only to the vessel containing the ice. The vessel may be much heated; but whether it will convey heat to the ice quick enough to heat it over 32 deg., and whether at all it can be heated over 32 deg., this is a question of a different nature. Before crediting such a conclusion we must know more of the details of the experiments which the professor made in order to verify its correctness. When saying that "on one occasion a small quantity of water was frozen in a glass vessel which was so hot that it could not be touched by the hand without burning it," he evidently assumes that if the vessel is hot, the ice inside must be equally so; but this assumption is erroneous. Faraday has made water to freeze in a red hot platina pot; the ice thus formed was not red hot like the platina, but was below the freezing point. Just so with Professor Carnelley's glass vessel: the vessel was hot, but the ice inside no doubt was "ice cold." If the professor would surround a thermometer bulb with ice and then make the mercury rise above the freezing point, we would believe in "hot ice;" not before. Until he does, we prefer to believe that the heat conveyed through the vessel to the ice is all absorbed in vaporizing the ice, and not in raising its temperature above 32 deg.. Professor Carnelley's further statement, apparently proving his theory, that the ice at once liquefies as soon as pressure is admitted (say by admitting air), is readily accounted for by the phenomena connected with the "Leydenfrost Drop." Water in a red hot vessel will vaporize off much slow
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
vessel
 

conclusion

 
professor
 

Carnelley

 
correctness
 

heated

 

platina

 
inside
 

freezing

 

Professor


melting
 

pressure

 

formed

 

remarkable

 

surround

 
articles
 

erroneous

 
burning
 
touched
 

Temperatures


heading

 

evidently

 

thermometer

 

Faraday

 

assumption

 

equally

 

assumes

 

freeze

 

mercury

 

readily


accounted
 

admitting

 

liquefies

 
admitted
 

phenomena

 

vaporize

 

connected

 

Leydenfrost

 
theory
 
proving

prefer

 

October

 
frozen
 

conveyed

 

statement

 

apparently

 

temperature

 

raising

 

absorbed

 

vaporizing