FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  
on whose continuance he wishes to be able to reckon, only if he is convinced that each of the contracting parties will find such an arrangement to his true and unqualified advantage. Such an alliance is, as I have shown in another place, the Austro-German. The two States, from the military no less than from the political aspect, are in the happiest way complements of each other. The German theatre of war in the east will be protected by Austria from any attempt to turn our flank on the south, while we can guard the northern frontier of Austria and outflank any Russian attack on Galicia. Alliances in which each contracting party has different interests will never hold good under all conditions, and therefore cannot represent a permanent political system. "There is no alliance or agreement in the world that can be regarded as effective if it is not fastened by the bond of the common and reciprocal interests; if in any treaty the advantage is all on one side and the other gets nothing, this disproportion destroys the obligation." These are the words of Frederick the Great, our foremost political teacher _pace_ Bismarck. We must not be blinded in politics by personal wishes and hopes, but must look things calmly in the face, and try to forecast the probable attitude of the other States by reference to their own interests. Bismarck tells us that "Illusions are the greatest danger to the diplomatist. He must take for granted that the other, like himself, seeks nothing but his own advantage." It will prove waste labour to attempt to force a great State by diplomatic arrangements to actions or an attitude which oppose its real interests. When a crisis arises, the weight of these interests will irresistibly turn the scale. When Napoleon III. planned war against Prussia, he tried to effect an alliance with Austria and Italy, and Archduke Albert was actually in Paris to conclude the military negotiations.[B] These probably were going on, as the French General Lebrun was in Vienna on the same errand. Both countries left France in the lurch so soon as the first Prussian flag flew victoriously on the heights of the Geisberg. A statesman less biassed than Napoleon would have foreseen this, since neither Austria nor Italy had sufficient interests at stake to meddle in such a war under unfavourable conditions. [Footnote B: When Colonel Stoffel, the well-known French Military Attache in Berlin, returned to Paris, and was recei
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  



Top keywords:

interests

 

Austria

 

advantage

 

alliance

 
political
 

French

 

Bismarck

 
conditions
 

attempt

 
Napoleon

attitude

 
contracting
 

German

 

military

 
wishes
 

States

 

effect

 

Prussia

 

Albert

 

granted


Archduke

 

diplomatic

 

arrangements

 
actions
 

oppose

 

crisis

 
arises
 

labour

 

irresistibly

 

weight


planned

 

sufficient

 

statesman

 

biassed

 
foreseen
 

meddle

 
unfavourable
 

Attache

 

Berlin

 
returned

Military

 

Footnote

 
Colonel
 

Stoffel

 
Geisberg
 

Vienna

 
errand
 
Lebrun
 

General

 
negotiations