FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268  
269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>  
dislike to all personal attack and controversy, that I abstain from reprinting, at this distance of time from the occasion which called them forth, the essays in which I criticized Dr. Colenso's book; I feel bound, however, after all that has passed, to make here a final declaration of my sincere impenitence for having published them. Nay, I cannot forbear repeating yet once more, for his benefit and that of his readers, this sentence from my original remarks upon him; _There is truth of science and truth of religion; truth of science does not become truth of religion till it is made religious._ And I will add: Let us have all the science there is from the men of science; from the men of religion let us have religion.[Arnold.] ~John William Colenso~ (1814-83), Bishop of Natal, published a series of treatises on the _Pentateuch_, extending from 1862-1879, opposing the traditional views about the literal inspiration of the Scriptures and the actual historical character of the Mosaic story. Arnold's censorious criticism of the first volume of this work is entitled _The Bishop and the Philosopher_ (_Macmillan's Magazine_, January, 1863). As an example of the Bishop's cheap "arithmetical demonstrations" he describes him as presenting the case of Leviticus as follows: "'_If three priests have to eat 264 pigeons a day, how many must each priest eat?_' That disposes of Leviticus." The essay is devoted chiefly to contrasting Bishop Colenso's unedifying methods with those of the philosopher Spinoza. In passing, Arnold refers also to Dr. Stanley's _Sinai and Palestine_ (1856), quotations from which are characterized as "the refreshing spots" in the Bishop's volume. [50] It has been said I make it "a crime against literary criticism and the higher culture to attempt to inform the ignorant." Need I point out that the ignorant are not informed by being confirmed in a confusion? [Arnold.] PAGE 44 [51] Joubert's _Pensees_, ed. 1850, II, 102, titre 23, 54. [52] ~Arthur Penrhyn Stanley~ (1815-81), Dean of Westminster. He was the author of a _Life_ of (Thomas) _Arnold_, 1844. In university politics and in religious discussions he was a Liberal and the advocate of toleration and comprehension. [53] ~Frances Power Cobbe~ (1822-1904), a prominent English philanthropist and woman of letters. The quotation below is from _Broken Lights_ (1864), p. 134. Her _Religious Duty_ (1857), referred to on p. 46, is a book of religious and et
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268  
269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>  



Top keywords:

Arnold

 

Bishop

 
science
 

religion

 
religious
 

Colenso

 

Leviticus

 

published

 

criticism

 

ignorant


volume

 
Stanley
 

refreshing

 

Lights

 
informed
 
inform
 
attempt
 

characterized

 

literary

 
higher

culture
 

methods

 

philosopher

 

unedifying

 
contrasting
 
disposes
 

devoted

 

chiefly

 

Spinoza

 

Religious


Palestine
 

quotations

 

referred

 

passing

 

refers

 

author

 

Thomas

 

Westminster

 

prominent

 
philanthropist

English

 
comprehension
 
Frances
 

toleration

 

advocate

 
university
 

politics

 
discussions
 

Liberal

 
Broken